Sunday, March 29, 2009

So Much Germany cared about Human Rights - Children from across Eastern Europe are being sold for sex, mostly to Germans, in a network of sex "bazaars

Children from across Eastern Europe are being sold for sex, mostly to Germans, in a network of sex "bazaars" along the border between Germany and the Czech Republic, says a UNICEF report. In many cases, the children are sold into prostitution by their own families.

They come from all regions of Germany, men ranging in age from 18 to 80, travelling alone in expensive cars that cross into the Czech Republic. Their destination is just beyond the border: bus stops, service stations
and rest areas that form the epicentre of a child prostitution ring that one official calls the biggest brothel in Europe.

A new report from the United Nations organization for children (UNICEF) says the German-Czech border has become a haven for pedophilia, with desperately poor families on the Czech side selling their children into
sex slavery and tens of thousands of Germans paying for access to children as young as eight, some of whom are paid with candy.

"The Czech Republic is becoming a discount market for sex with children," said Adolf Gallwitz, a German police psychologist. Mr. Gallwitz said pedophilia in the southeast German border regions of Bavaria and Saxony is increasing "at an incredible rate," and he estimated 50,000 Germans visit the Czech Republic's burgeoning sex tourism industry.

The author of the UNICEF report, Cathrin Schauer, said areas such as bus stops and service stations near the border have been converted into "bazaars" where child prostitutes are bought and sold.

full story: http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/thomas100806.htm

Paedophiles, Cheb sex capital of Europe

Captive market:
The sexual slave traffic in children

By Gordon Thomas

Sunday, October 8, 2006

It was dusk when the BMWs and Mercedes once more began to enter Cheb on Christmas Eve, 2004. By midnight, the expensive cars cruised its streets. The town is on the Czech-German border, a crossing point on the highway that leads to Prague from Bavaria and Saxony.

Cheb is a mecca for German paedophiles who come to this drab town, with its ugly Stalinist-era apartment blocks and poorly-lit back streets for one purpose.

Every night, since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Cheb has maintained its reputation as the child sex capital of Europe. These include what are known as "the specials": children so small, so vulnerable, so fragile, that they cannot solicit for themselves. They are offered to the drivers of those cars by their "keepers". This is the shame of Czechoslovakia, a country that now prides itself on having a future in the European Community.

For the equivalent of US $50 a paedophile can take his pick of children often barely out of their diapers.

They are the ultimate degradation for a town of 38,000 people. With over 100 brothels, no one knows exactly how many young prostitutes work in them or on the streets of Cheb.

On New Year's Day, 2004, Europe's newspapers reported the latest child-sex scandal. A former Portuguese cabinet minister tipped to lead his socialist party, Paulo Pedroso, and a former ambassador to South Africa, Jorge Ritto, along with eight others, including a doctor and two television presenters, were all charged with sexually abusing minors.

Outside Portugal most newspapers gave little space to the revelations. They have become all too commonplace.

The allegedly abused children of Portugal represent a fraction of a global industry. Its annual revenues were estimated in 2003 to exceed half a trillion dollars globally. This is twice the value of all United States currency currently in circulation at any given time, more than the annual gross national products of many countries.

To understand the sheer size of profits accruing from such terrible misery, consider this: a million dollars in gold would weigh as much as a Japanese Sumo wrestler. A half trillion dollars would come close to exceeding the entire population weight of a medium sized Australian city.

The profits come from child sexual trafficking in all its forms: white slavery, sex rings, pornography, the sex tourism industry, lap dancing, bogus adoption schemes and procuring the victims -- the untold millions of children globally entrapped in the sex trade industry who are forced to allow their bodies to be used in exchange for food, money, shelter, alcohol and drugs.

Children are bought, sold, traded and misused in underground child sex markets daily. Every state in the United States, and every other nation, contributes in some fashion to the steady flow of children, the customers and exploiters.

It is estimated that the profits from this vast evil empire, when properly invested, would draw an interest exceeding US $2 million an hour. The sexual trafficking in children is not so much an industry but a global empire.

Sovereign and expansionist, it is frequently torn by internal struggle -- fights to the death between the Chinese Triads and the Russian Mafia, between the multi-gangs of the Balkans, are commonplace. But the empire presents a secret front to the world. It is from there it plunders our children, snatches them, never to be seen again.

The predators who control the sexual trafficking in children are well organized. They have thugs who snatch and break the resistance of children; banks who account the empire's profits without asking questions; ships that convey the hapless children from one continent to another and private planes that transport them to clients around the world.

Yet there is little or no cohesive and sustained war against this terrible evil. The United States and Britain try to stamp on the trafficking within its own borders. But as yet there is no universal challenge to the ever-growing sexual trafficking in children.

The shabby streets of Cheb are but one staging post in a necklace of shame that encircles the globe.

To the east of Cheb, a battered Volvo crossed into northern Bosnia. Hidden under filthy blankets were four teenage girls. One, a blonde called Maria, had just celebrated her thirteenth birthday.

To prepare for the long and uncomfortable journey, the girls had each been given an injection by a doctor. They were told it was to alleviate travel sickness. In reality it was a cocktail of drugs to keep them drowsy and unable to try and escape. This is standard procedure for the men operating this segment of the network in sexual trafficking that criss-crosses the Balkans.

The doctor is a man known by his first name only, Goran, in the girl's hometown of Chisinau, the capital of Europe's poorest country, Moldova. It has some of the prettiest children in central Europe. This has made it a magnet for the traffickers.

They moved in soon after the collapse of the Communist system in the country. Since then there is a widely accepted estimate that some 6,000 girls have been trafficked out of Moldova. No one knows how many of them received their drug injections from Dr Goran.

The girls in the Volvo had answered advertisements in a Chisinau newspaper. The ads promised them work in Paris, London and Dublin -- and even in the United States. The posts on offer included maids, nannies, house-keeping and bar work. The ads stressed no previous experience was required. The salaries were far beyond those available in Moldova.

A Moldavian recruiter told the girls their journey would involve them first being secretly driven over the border into Bosnia. There, they would receive passports, for which they had already paid him US $100 -- money borrowed from their families and friends. Then they would go West to earn undreamed of money. So they had been promised.

The break-up of the former Yugoslavia, followed by a vicious war in the region and the establishment of new states under the 1995 Dayton peace accord, had left many Balkan countries with virtually no legislation or border controls to deal with the sexual traffic in young women and children.

By the time Maria and her three young friends had been tricked into making the journey in the Volvo, the profits from sexual trafficking in the Balkans were matching those of the drug trade -- and the penalties for smuggling humans were minimal.

The border guards into Bosnia waved the Volvo through. The car was a familiar sight to them. Each time it crossed, the guards received US $200 for allowing its unhampered passage.

Five hours later the Volvo reached its final destination. "Arizona Market" is on the outskirts of Kosovo. The town resembles the old Wild West rather than Central Europe in the Third Millennium. It is also the UN headquarters in Bosnia.

An area interlaced with muddy tracks lead to establishments with names like Café Marlboro, Café Don, and The Golden Heart. Fronted by heaps of refuse, used condoms and empty liquor bottles, they are brothels. Between them stand wooden huts selling cheap denim clothes, alcohol, perfume, and guns.

Inside the sleazy bars, the scene seldom changes: dimmed red lights, loud music, cheap drinks -- and semi-naked girls. Usually they are draped over the men known as "the internationalists". These are the soldiers of the United Nations multi-national peace keeping force. In 2003, it consisted of 45,000 soldiers drawn from 39 countries. In addition, there were some 7,000 UN staff as well as members of over 200 Western aid agencies.

Many of the girls appear to be drugged -- and not only from the ready supply of cocaine and heroin on open sale.

An American aid agency worker said: "Lookit, the bar owners who bought these girls like to keep them nice and quiet. So they buy drugs from some of the UN medics to do so. When a girl has finished her shift, she is taken to her room by a bar man and given a shot. When she wakes up she is ready for her next shift".

This is Arizona Market. Officially established by the peacekeeping forces to foster trade between Serbs, Croats and Muslims, today its five square miles is the epicenter of Bosnia's booming sex-slaves trade.

This was the destination of the four young girls. They would work here as prostitutes -- and maybe die -- in this forsaken place.

Almost 2,000 miles to the south of Bosnia, in the tropical heat of West Africa, a group of girls, each no more than thirteen years old, made their way to a small square in the suburbs of Abidjan, the capital of the Ivory Coast. They were escorted by hard-faced young men, the gold in their teeth glinting in the searing sunlight.

Dressed in their Sunday best -- colourful print cotton dresses -- with hair washed and combed, the girls were directed to sit on wooden benches in the centre of the square.

Each girl was for sale as a slave. Their prices ranged from US $5 -- the cost of a coffee in what passes for the city's finest hotel -- to the most expensive child, an eleven year old, costing US $15.

The place is known, locally, as Le Marche de Jeunes Filles -- the Market of Young Girls.

Buyers, men carrying fly-whisks, and sharp-eyed women, strolled up and down along the benches, feeling one girl's arm, looking at another's teeth. One was asked to stand and twirl. Another to bend.

Around the edges of the square stood the traders. The moment a prospective buyer stopped, a trader was there to emphasise a girl's good points.

"She is young and disease free. She is strong and will obey your every command. She will do whatever you want..." he would intone.

No one knows today how many sexual slaves there are in the world. The International Organisation for Migration estimated in December, 2003, that from Eastern Europe alone there could be half a million.

Anti-Slavery International believes the global figure may run to "tens of millions". The one certainty, adds the world's oldest human rights organisation, is that there are more sexual slaves than ever before.

The United States State Department announced in June, 2003, that fifteen countries were now deeply involved in trafficking humans. They included Greece and Italy, both members of the European Community. The State Department estimated that through the fifteen countries almost one million adults and children brought and sold annually into the sex slave market. Secretary of State Colin Powell rightly called it a blight on humanity.

There is growing evidence that many of those slaves are traded over the internet; pimps, often catering for extreme sexual demands ranging from unprotected sex to torture, can log on to women and children best suited to their "markets".

In Britain, Scotland Yard believes that over 5,000 girls from former-Communist countries were smuggled into the country in 2003. Each earned their pimps an estimated over US $2,000 a day.

Bill Hughes, Director General of Britain's National Crime Squad, said: "A growing number of girls are barely into their teens. Although the number is small compared to such countries as Greece and Italy, it has had a startling impact on London's indigenous vice trade.

"British teenagers have been moved out by their pimps into the city suburbs as their rates are undercut by sex slaves imported from the Balkans into London's traditional Soho red light district.

"They have come from Romania, the Ukraine and Moldova. The great majority have escaped from dirt-poor villages, with no modern form of communications -- some villages do not even have a single telephone let alone a policeman.

"That makes it easier for a young girl to be lured away or kidnapped from their homes -- and never to be traced again", added Hughes.

The former Soviet Republics are the nexus of the traffic. Serbia and Yugoslavia are key staging posts along this road of unspeakable misery. It is in those countries that the majority of girls are housed, waiting for pimps to conduct an initial inspection. The girls -- and some boys -- are then taken by road to one of the regular "flesh markets".

In 2003, those sales took place in the many apartment block complexes on the outskirts of Belgrade. The girls are handled like livestock and, once one has been bought by a pimp -- prices can be up to US $1,500 for a teenager, double that for a pre-teen -- the victim will usually be beaten, drugged and forced to have sex with scores of men a week. If she tries to escape, she can be subjected to further horrendous sexual abuse -- and warned that if she tries again to escape, her family back home will be killed.

The Belgrade apartments are owned by Semion Yokovich Mogilevich. He is a specialist in every type of major crime. A document by MI5, Britain's internal security service, describes this Ukranian as "one of the most dangerous criminals on earth".

Mogilevich is wanted in the United States for a multitude of crimes including bank frauds, money laundering and other currency offences. He is protected by his own private army -- and, according to CIA sources, he has a liking for young girls. Documents in the agency possession show he is a regular visitor to the apartments to pick out a girl.

One CIA document identifies Mogilevich as the head of the Rising Sun, one of Moscow's major criminal families.

"His business is global prostitution, drug running and traffic in humans. He runs a dark and evil empire. A number of people who have crossed his path have been disposed of. He has his own team of killers never further away than a phone call", said former British intelligence officer Colin Wallace.

Unable to travel to the West for fear of immediate arrest, Mogilevich moves between Moscow and Belgrade with his bodyguards and his latest choice of girl.

The office for the UN High Commission for Human Rights has identified other criminal gangs from Macedonia and Serbia as being involved in sex trafficking. But along with Mogilevich, it is the criminal warlords of Albania who now dominate it.

A report prepared by the Commission states:

"Girls who've shown signs of disobedience have had their feet cemented into washbasins before being dumped in the Aegean Sea. Others have been horrifically tortured. The Albanian gangs have a seemingly endless supply of women, and their power extends way beyond their homeland to the underworlds of Italy and parts of New York. The victims do not officially exist and are powerless to resist."

Most Albanian gangsters are men in their twenties from the backward north of the country. Rather than being based around individual gangland bosses, they are organized in clans bound by an ancient code of honour called kanun. Some of the profits are returned to their homelands.

In 2002, UN administration in Kosovo and Bosnia enacted new laws to prohibit the traffic. But there have been few prosecutions, and such as have occurred have been tainted by charges of corruption. UN teams set up to rescue the girls have often found that when they organise a raid, the brothel-keepers have been tipped off.

A UN report into trafficking claims that some Western officials are undermining attempts to clean up the trade by becoming cronies of Balkan pimps. The same is true of some of the international and local police. In one case, cited by the report, Bulgarian border police took money from girls to secure their safe passage back to Bulgaria, only to hand them back to the traffickers in exchange for yet more money.

The fate of those four young girls who were smuggled over the border into Bosnia to work in Arizona Market was to be hustled from the Volvo into a large wooden building. Standing around its walls were the brothel keepers of Arizona Market. Maria and her companions were ordered to undress. When Maria refused, her dress was ripped from her. Naked, she and the other girls were forced to stand on wooden crates. The brothel keepers physically inspected the women.

Then the bidding began. In minutes Maria had been sold to a brothel keeper for US $1,500. The other girls fetched prices ranging from US $350 to US $1,200.

For US $20 a client could spend thirty minutes with Maria. For US $2.50 he could buy a bottle of beer while he satisfied himself.

Maria would soon discover that there was no escape from a life where she is expected to have unprotected sex. She is owned body and soul by the man who bought her. All she receives are three meals a day, a bed to sleep on and the skimpy clothes her owner insists she must wear to attract clients.

A UN peacekeeper in Kosovo, who asked not to be named, told me: "Often the girls are sold on by other brothel keepers. They are traded like cattle and are routinely beaten and drugged. If a girl tries to escape, she is raped or tortured -- or told that her mother back home will be killed."

Milan Sitilovic, the Bosnian police chief with responsibility for Arizona Market says: "How can we stop it? Prostitution is the oldest profession in the world".

Frederick Larson who headed the office of the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) in Sarajevo identified the problem, "the girls are terrified of testifying against their owners. Those who dare to do so are simply murdered".

In 2001, the naked bodies of several girls were found in a river near Arizona Market. They bore the hallmarks of Russian mafia-style killings; hands had been tied behind their backs and their feet set in concrete. Their breasts had been slashed off.

Arizona Market is situated close to the Bosnian headquarters of the US peacekeeping force. During 2002, six Russian soldiers, members of K-For, gang-raped two girls in the Arizona Market. As they were "owned" by the club owner, the soldiers paid him a small sum in compensation. No other charges were brought against the rapists.

Those who survive such inhumane treatment are often sold on to the international slave market.

Paul Holmes, of London's Metropolitan Police Vice Squad, has estimated that 80% of all women working in the brothels of Britain's capital are from the Balkans. His own investigations concluded that the traffic in women had made their owners at least US $75 million since the start of the Third Millennium.

His facts and figures can be repeated through the Western world. In Paris, Dublin, Rome, New York, Montreal and Los Angeles, police report the same story: when rescued from sexual bondage, the women are too terrified to testify against those who traffic in them.

As of now the penalties against trading in preteen sex slaves is small compared to those handed out against drug runners or arms dealers. Indeed, in Bosnia, the offence is not even on the statute book.

Pino Arlacchi, executive director of the United Nations Office of Drug Control and Crime Prevention said: "the trafficking in people is now the fastest growing transnational criminal activity".

Frederick Larson explained that, apart from his organisation, there is almost nothing to protect sex slaves in Bosnia.

The girls are regarded as illegal immigrants, and are treated as such, rather than the victims of gross human rights violations. All NATO and UN officials who frequent Arizona Market are entitled to immunity from Bosnian prosecution -- although not from legal consequences when they return home.

However, the possibility of any conviction in a US or UK court is non-existent, given that no abused girl is ever likely to be able to give evidence.

Recently an international police team carried out a raid on three bars in Arizona Market. They rescued thirty-four girls, three of whom were aged just fourteen. The raids were carried out without the assistance of the local police.

Afterwards, team members faced disciplinary charges for "exceeding their authority". The charges were not pursued; the officers have quietly left Bosnia.

The IOM has set up safe houses in Sarajevo to protect girls, some as young as eleven, who have escaped from brothels.

"The best we can do is to offer them support and repatriation", said Larson.

But the reality again is that a girl who does go home to a country like Moldova is often cast-out by her family who suspect what happened to her in Bosnia. All too often, she ends up prostituting herself on the streets of the country's capital, Chisnau.

In Bosnia, the international peace-keeping force has failed to control, let alone eradicate, the transport of sexual slaves.

Jaque Grinberg, the UN missions head of civil affairs -- a caring and committed official -- said there was "an urgent need for an effective border force". The office of the High Representative in Bosnia ordered its creation. But there was no money to bring it to reality.

The trafficking business started with the arrival of UN peacekeepers in 1993. Until then Bosnia had no "sex industry". The mission of the peacekeepers was to bring democracy. But too many of their members saw an easy way to make money as well as satisfy their own sexual desires.

"After the peacekeepers arrived, criminal gangs who had smuggled guns during the war began to traffic in women and girls. There was more profit and less risk. And so it goes on", said a member of the international police force, Don Thomas.

"The evils of what is going on are obvious. But the problem is that the victims are horribly exploited, many of them also claim they are not in Bosnia involuntarily. That is the rub. How can you convince some kid who is so terrified that she will not talk? If she opens her mouth she is dead meat", added Thomas.

The worst offenders are the 3,000 Russian peace-keepers. Some girls have described how friends were taken into the Russian camps and never seen again.


Unlike Bosnia, where the UN peacekeepers arrived in a blaze of publicity, no one knows exactly when "the Germans" started to arrive in their big cars for sex with the children of Cheb.

The men who drive into the cheerless town know they no longer have to fly to Thailand to have sex with a child.

Many of the child prostitutes come from Cheb's large Roman refugee population. Their knowledge of German is confined to the sexual words of their trade.

By night, they haunt the park adjoining the town's Evropska Street or stand in darkened doorways in the alleys.

New byelaws have forbidden street prostitution in the centre of Cheb; video cameras have been installed to monitor the area.

Catherin Schauer, a nurse who works for Karo, a child-rescue project supported by the German Red Cross and the European Commission, said the police are largely indifferent to what goes on.

"Those who work as prostitutes are usually homeless and turned on to drugs. They start by sniffing glue and then move on to a substance known as ‘piko", a cheap amphetamine which suppresses feelings of cold and hunger", said Schauer.

Some of the children have been born in Cheb after their families fled from eastern Europe in the aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union. At an age when their childhood is beginning to expand, they are forced into prostitution.

One girl, her face smeared with make-up who admitted she was thirteen, said "the Germans like us to wear as little as possible. I only wear a short skirt and a t-shirt and my sandals".

She added that in "a good night" she had four or five clients. "They pay me anything from US $20 to US $30 dollars. It's good money for a few hours of work. I always make them use a condom. But some of the younger girls allow unprotected sex. Because they are not menstruating, they believe they won't become pregnant".

Catherine Schauer said that a growing number of these under-age girls had developed HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.

She and her colleagues distribute condoms to the children. The rescue centre has a drop-in facility where the children can go for treatment.

"We are a little sensitive about all this. There would not be a problem but for the Germans. We know that the sex tourists are 99 percent from Bavaria and Saxony", said Petr Jaks, Cheb's deputy mayor.

He did admit there had been "a problem to get our police motivated, but we hope this will change soon".

A senior police officer reluctantly agreed to talk on the basis of having his identity concealed.

"My colleagues and I have better things to do than check on every kid who hangs around the streets. As far as we are concerned, they are just out for a night of fun. Look at the way they dress: good quality jeans, Adidas shoes. Sure, they may take a little dope. But so do the kids in Munich."

What about all the Germans who drive into the town every night? The officer shrugged. "They spend good money in our bars. If they pick up a girl, so what. It happens everywhere."

Even small children? He smiled indifferently. "How can you tell if a girl is ten, thirteen or fifteen? These Romanian kids grow up quickly. Anyway, why pick on Cheb? Prostitution is all along the border."

That is true. At every crossing, the child whores are there, alongside the traders selling cheap cigarettes and Becherovka, the Czech national drink.

Catherin Schauer and her small team of dedicated social workers note down the license plate numbers of the German cars entering the town, then send them to the nearest German city of Regensburg.

There is a German law, passed in 1993, under which the Federal Republic can prosecute men who have sex with minors abroad. If found guilty, a culprit can be sentenced up to ten years in jail.

But, as in Bosnia, the reality is very different. Josef Heisl, a police officer with the Regensburg force said "when we get the license plates from Cheb, we do question the car drivers. The men just say they were looking for directions. To make a successful prosecution, we have to catch a man in the act of having sex with a minor -- or get a child to file a complaint. That is purely wishful thinking".

Just as in Cheb, the turnover of girls is high at Le Marche de Jeunes Filles -- the baked earth market place in Abidjan, the capital of the Ivory Coast.

The girls come from the country's remote rural areas, lured away from their villages by promise of a better life in the city. Family and friends sew their new clothes and arrange their hair before they leave home. But once they arrive in Abidjan, they find there is no work; instead they are sold-off like cattle in that market place.

Some, the lucky ones, are sent to toil in up-country cocoa plantations. Others are shipped off to Sudan, where slave traders shackle them for the long journey to the Middle East to restock the region's brothels.

Still others end up in a truck stop called Salgaa on the main Kenya-Uganda highway. It is the biggest whorehouse in central Africa. In 2003, it had 24 bars and 500 prostitutes -- an estimated half of them under age.

In a regional economy that is close to collapse elsewhere, Salgaa is booming. It is a cut-price version of Arizona Market. In Salgaa a child can be procured for one US dollar. In Salgaa the life expectancy of a prostitute is put in months rather than years. Their clients are the thousands of truck drivers who travel every week up and down the highway.

The girls work out of seedy bars with names like the Good Times Hotel and New Paradise.

AIDS is a killer by many names here: "mikingo" meaning "slow puncture"; and "kauzi" meaning "slim as a thread", an apt description to describe the body wasting process of the disease.

Sharin Cmemtai, who admitted to being "only fifteen", said that her "worst clients are the Arabs. They can be very violent. I try to charge them more. But it is impossible for me to keep the extra money. He always takes it straight away after sex".

"He" was her pimp, a burly Kenyan who is reputed to have a stable of fifty young girls, a number of them in their pre-teens, working in Salgaa.

His girls live in a small compound. It has one water tap, two showers and three stinking pit latrines. Most weeks a girl is diagnosed as in the final stages of AIDS. Overnight she will be taken from the compound by the pimp. There is a widespread fear she is dumped in the bush to be devoured by the jackals or other wild animals.

Within hours a new girl will arrive as a replacement.

She, too, can expect to be dead within a year. To survive longer in Salgaa is a miracle.

Only none of the girls who work there believe in such divine intervention.

The global traffic in children for commercial sexual exploitation involves torture and their premeditated rape and mutilation. If and when the authorities decide to take action against the child sex trade, it achieves very little.

This terrible human abuse, the prerogative of no one race or colour, continues to occur under all religions, and where there is no religion. The sexual traffic in children is the product of greed and lust which feeds off abject poverty.

There is no solution in sight until that poverty is addressed -- and the traffickers sentenced to long terms. By a collective indifference and silence, the betrayal of children will persist.

© Gordon Thomas 2006

Saturday, March 28, 2009

So Much Australia cared about Human Rights - Aborigines letter to the UN

World's governments being asked to help the Aborigines

Goodooga, northwest-NSW, 24 March 09 - - As Australia is having to answer to the United Nations Human Rights Committee over its treatment of Aborigines, a northwest-NSW Aboriginal leader is asking the governments of all member countries of the UN to help overturn the Northern Territory intervention and recognise Aboriginal sovereignty.

This follows an urgent decision by the UN's Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination on 13 March condemning Australia's suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act as part of the intervention.

Michael Anderson, Leader of the Euahlayi Nation and elected spokesman of the 16 clans in the Gumilaroi nation, has lobbied at past CERD conferences and has written the letter below to member countries' missions in New York.

"Australia must be held accountable by the international community for its Human Rights breaches and abuses against Aboriginal Peoples in Australia and its strident opposition to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples," Anderson says in the letter.

Anderson and other Aboriginal leaders from all over Australia have also asked President Barack Obama to intervene (http://sydney.indymedia.org.au/story/media-release-aboriginal-people-brief-barack-obama-his-meeting-kevin-rudd) when he meets with Prime Minister Kevin Rudd in Washington on Wednesday our time (early Tuesday US).

Here is the letter to the UN missions:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

23 March 2009

Your Excellency,

Australia's continued human rights violations and abuses of Aboriginal peoples

We enter into this correspondence with you to highlight the fact that Australia has not earned the right to have permanency status on the UN Security Council.

Australia is the only country in the world that has a constitution that allows for the imposition of laws and/or regulations that target specific racial groups. Section 51 (xxvi) says:
Australian Constitution - Section 51 - Legislative powers of the Parliament

The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:-

(xxvi.) The people of any race, for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws:
In the Hindmarsh Island Court case, Justice Kirby pointed out that this section does not necessarily require any Australian government, whether they be Labor, Liberal or National Party, to always pass beneficial laws, rather it permits the passing of laws that can be detrimental or against any race as they deem necessary. [Kartinyeri-v-The Commonwealth 1998 HCA (High Court of Australia) 22 at para 163]

If we are to question why this section exists at all in the Australian constitution, we only have to visit some key documents that describe the thinking that existed in Australia pre-federation of 1901 and immediately thereafter.

In 1901 the first federal prime minister, Edmund Barton, advocated for a continent that could be free of ‘contamination' by foreign and unwanted racial impurities by quoting Professor Pearson:

'The fear of Chinese immigration which the Australian democracy cherishes ... is in fact, the instinct of self-preservation, quickened by experience ... We are guarding the last part of the world in which the higher races can live and increase freely for the higher civilisation ... The day will come ... when the European observers will look around the globe girdled with a continuous zone of the yellow and black races. It is idle to say that if all this should come to pass our pride and place will not be humiliated. We are struggling among ourselves for supremacy in a world which we thought of as destined to belong to the Aryan race; and to the Christian faith; to the letters and arts and charms which we have inherited from the best of times.'

Unfortunately the majority of European and non-Aboriginal thinking in Australia today continues to reflect racist ideologies, which in turn permits the continued emergence of prejudice and discrimination against Aboriginal Peoples by the dominant society.

Australia is a country of contradictions. On the one hand, it promotes living in harmony and reconciliation, without any real effort to enter into meaningful dialogue with the Aboriginal communities throughout Australia. This reflects Australia's unwillingness to recognise Aboriginal Peoples for who we really are.

Aboriginal people continue to argue that we have never been defeated in battle, neither have we ceded nor relinquished our sovereignty.

Australia continues to operate in the world under a flawed legal assumption that Australia is bona fide by virtue of an antiquated international doctrine as is referred to in the Mabo judgment No. 2 when Brennan J relied upon:

'The acquisition of territory by a sovereign state for the
first time is an act of state which cannot be challenged,
controlled or interfered with by the courts of that state.'

[Mabo v Queensland (No 2) ("Mabo case") [1992] HCA 23; (1992)
175 CLR 1 (3 June 1992) at para 31]

It cannot be a fact that a civilised society, which has been invaded in this manner, does not have any legal rights to question the powers of the invading authorities. In respect to the claim of Act of State, former chief Justice Mason of the High Court commented after the Mabo decision that Blackstone's Commentaries on international law at the time clearly suggest that the Aboriginal Nation States could be recognised and therefore treaties and other arrangements could be entered into, if the invading State had chosen to. There is sufficient correspondence between the invaders in Australia and British colonialists in England that suggested and recommended that treaties with the Aborigines be entered into but the colonial authorities in the invaded territories refused.

We assert that the court got it right when it states that the issue of Aboriginal Sovereignty cannot be dealt with by the High Court and it belongs to another jurisdiction. Brennan J concludes in the High Court Mabo No.2 Judgment:

‘1. The Crown's acquisition of sovereignty over the several parts of Australia cannot be challenged in an Australian municipal court.‘ [at para 83]

All laws passed in relation to Native Title rights and interests are legally presumptuous and therefore the judgements are dubious, because the issue of the Sovereignty of Aboriginal Peoples is still subject to international legal definition. While the Mabo judgement No. 2 erased the myth of terra nullius, we cannot permit Australia to continue with another myth, which is that associated with the High Court's right to rule on Aboriginal proprietary interests in land (Native Title rights) without first having resolved the issue of Aboriginal Sovereignty in Australia by the international legal jurisdiction.

I also wish to draw attention to the Northern Territory Emergency Response. Advice given to me suggests that this NT Intervention is a response to an alleged state of emergency associated with child abuse and domestic violence and that the executive government in 2007 irrationally decreed this Northern Territory Emergency Response, which has its origin in martial law.

Since colonisation there have been a number of proclamations of a similar nature, which gave the police and the military absolute power and authority over Aboriginal Peoples in a defined area, e.g. Governor Macquarie's Proclamation of 1815.

Under the existing Northern Territory ‘state of emergency' all powers have been vested in the military, which has engaged the Federal Police to police the communities, thus presenting an image of civil control outside of the military. This practice is merely a façade to shield the military powers. In order for the NT Intervention to remain ‘legal' it requires the continuation of the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act (RDA) 1975 in Australia.

On 13 March 2009 the Urgent Action CERD decision from Fatimata-Binta Victoire Dah, Chairperson of the Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, condemned Australia's suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975:

'... in order to continue a constructive dialogue with your Government, the Committee requests the State party to submit further details and information on the following issues no later than 31 July 2009:

  • Progress on the drafting of the redesigned measures, in direct consultation with the communities and individuals affected by the NTER [Northern Territory Emergency Response], bearing in mind their proposed introduction to the Parliament in September 2009.
  • Progress on the lifting of the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act.'

Aboriginal people question how can compulsorily acquiring peoples' land protect children and why does the Australian government need until September before they reverse the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act. It is within their power (if the political will is there) to repeal the Northern Territory Emergency Response Acts and reinstate the Racial Discrimination Act in the next winter sitting of Federal Parliament. The question is why do they wait till our next spring sitting before they do it.

Today, 23 March 2009, the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Jenny Macklin, has advised the Tangentyere Council in Alice Springs that she has extended the deadline for the Tangentyere Council to sign over their leases of the Town Camps, under their jurisdiction, by 2 May 2009, otherwise no housing projects will be funded nor will any community infrastructure be put in place for Aboriginal communities in these Town Camps. This is an act by an intolerant minister, who is dictating and blackmailing defenceless and disadvantaged peoples.

Detail of the racism imposed by the Northern Territory Intervention recently sent to President Obama is available from this link:

http://sydney.indymedia.org.au/story/letter-president-obama-barbara-shaw-rudd-government-s-treatment-aboriginal-nations-and-peoples

In conclusion, it is our hope that from this piece of correspondence your government will raise the seriousness of the issues that we have discussed with the Australian Labor government and urge them, in the strongest terms, to take immediate steps to reinstate the Racial Discrimination Act that affects the civil liberties, rights and freedoms of Aboriginal Peoples in Australia, under the Early Warning and Urgent Action procedures of the CERD.

Moreover, we ask that you include in your correspondence, should your government decide to do so, to urge in the strongest terms to repeal the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 in the Native Title Amendment Act 1998, as was recommended by CERD and ECOSOC, and to permit the courts of Australia to consider Aboriginal proprietary interests and rights in land as a common law right, as was the case in the original Mabo No. 2 judgement, as opposed to having the courts decide rights and interests based upon a coded legislative regime set by the Australian Parliament.

Australia must be held accountable by the international community for its Human Rights breaches and abuses against Aboriginal Peoples in Australia and its strident opposition to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

This is why we have criticised Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd's ambition to seek permanency status on the UN Security Council. Australia has not earned this right and responsibility.

Yours faithfully

Michael Anderson

Leader of Euahlayi Nation

+61 (0) 427 292 492 and +61 2 6829 6355

ngurampaa@bigpond.com

So Much the UN cared about Human Rights - Tamil Links in UN, Terrorism, bogus refugees and terrorist funding from UK

Open Letter to Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon UN

Ben Silva UK



18 – 03 - 09

Dear Sir,
Tamil Links in UN, terrorism, bogus refugees and terrorist funding from UK

I have discussed below, various inter linked issues related to terrorism, Sri Lanka and the UN so that you are aware of the concerns of many Sri Lankans.
When LTTE carried out terrorism in Sri Lanka, UN was absolutely silent and gave no help to deal with terrorism. UN was silent when terrorists carried out child soldier recruitment and when Tamil LTTE carried out terrorist activities against defenceless civilians. UN was silent when LTTE agents killed defenceless Sinhala villagers by hacking them to death. UN is incapable of understanding the true situation in Sri Lanka and UN is unable to distinguish between the victim and the culprit. UN did nothing to dismantle the shipping, procurement, financial, propaganda and other LTTE structures that are overseas, from India to Canada and Australia. In short, UN did nothing to curtail the activities of the terrorist group LTTE. Terrorism could have been eliminated by cutting off their life line, but UN did nothing of the sort, and is now trying to give a life line to the terrorists. In the view of many, such attempts will only lead to more unnecessary loss of human lives. What is even more worrying is evidence that LTTE has managed to infiltrate UN. Leaked reports containing incorrect data based on LTTE media outlets, quoted in the Inner City Press, , is an indication that LTTE sympathisers are busy discrediting Sri Lanka. The biased nature of UN in favour of LTTE is a serious matter and need the attention of senior UN officials.

In a nutshell, the problem appears to be that a group of global, networked Tamils are funding the Sri Lankan terror group LTTE, to create a mono ethnic racial state, perhaps with the intention of expanding Tamil Nadu state, in South India.

If UN is genuinely interested in Human rights, it would have taken action to stop funding being received by LTTE.
Sri Lanka is a victim of terrorism and the people who should be responsible for the death and destruction in Sri Lanka are those that funded the terrorists, those that gave residency to bogus refugees and those that turned a blind eye to terrorism such as UK authorities and the UN.

Tamils have projected the image that they are the underdogs, in order to get sympathy and to obtain bogus refugee status. In reality Tamils are a powerful group with international connections, even connection in the UN. They are attempting to carve out a part of Sri Lanka. The real underdogs and the victims are the poor, voiceless, Sinhalese peasants.

It is indeed UK that allowed an estimated 300000 bogus refugees [9],[11] into UK and then turned a blind eye to propaganda and fund raising by LTTE agents. The global bogus Tamil refugees number around 1 million and they appear to exert considerable unfair political muscle. It is utter hypocrisy for UK to show concern about human rights, when it is UK that allowed LTTE to base its head Office in London and then allowed LTTE to grow into a monster.

It is well known that LTTE fire at fleeing civilians and have killed escaping civilians, as a human shield is the only way to protect the terrorists from the security forces. In addition LTTE have sent suicide bombers to IDP camps, to discourage civilians to escape to safe areas. Rather sadly, any liberation of civilians may cause collateral damage. It is hoped that the damage is kept to a minimum. Even neutralising 10 terrorists in Mumbai resulted in the loss of over 200 civilians.

The situation in Sri Lanka is a complex issue and asking for a ceasefire, without understanding the situation is meaningless.

Both UN and UK have been touting for a ceasefire. I will ask the question, which has been asked by Shenali Waduge before, ‘how can a ceasefire release civilian hostages especially those being forcefully kept by the LTTE and condensed to 31sq.km?’
It is most likely that LTTE will use the ceasefire to rearm, regroup and increase the grip on civilians, as they have done on all occasions previously, costing more lives, when LTTE is dislodged. It is certain to cost more lives if they are allowed to survive. It is important that OHCHR, the UN, the Peace Activists, the NGOs/INGOs and all those who steer the bandwagon for ceasefires actually make an attempt to understand the situation in Sri Lanka. This may be difficult task due to the lack of professionalism of the above mentioned groups.

These groups such as HRW do not even understand that authenticity, accuracy, bias are important issues to be considered when using secondary data. These groups including UN and HRW appear to use innuendo, hearsay, propaganda material from LTTE media outlets such as Tamilnet as Gospel truth. The above mentioned groups simply parrot LTTE propaganda. Further Tamils in UN such as Ms Navanethem Pillay appear to play Tamil Tiger tribal politics, which will discredit UN. Ms Pillay has not recognised that ‘human rights violations in this respect has been brought about by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, the LTTE, when it mercilessly herded up the civilian population of Wanni, uprooted them from their traditional habitats and marched them on foot day and night as human shields. This was done at gunpoint’. Ref: United Nations is not the place for Navi Pillay to serve, by Durga Velautham in New Delhi, http://www.amarasara.info/hotnews/20090318-01.htm#United

Many would ask, did she ignore LTTE atrocities because she is a racist LTTE supporter or is it because she is incompetent as her predecessor, clueless Ms Arbour was. Or is it that UN is unable to stand up to powerful and rich terrorist groups and simply put the blame on the victim ?

As for the civilians trapped by LTTE, they are the brothers and sisters of all Sri Lankans and it is our duty to protect them.

As such, the biased opinions of Tamils, playing tribal politics need to be challenged and appropriate persons informed. For both UN and UK, they can talk peace, but for Sri Lankans, who have lost over 60000. due to the terrorist menace and who have suffered enormously, action is needed to permanently eradicate terrorism.

It is complete fallacy to talk about Tamil Home land in Sri Lanka, when the whole of Sri Lanka was the home of the Sinhalese . The Tamil home land is in South India. Unfortunately, from time to time, invaders from South India, temporarily occupied parts of Sri Lanka and they were always driven back. Modern Sri Lanka, in a global village, should be for all Sri Lankans, and racists should not be allowed to grab a part of Sri Lanka, for a mono ethnic, racist Tamil state.

UK heavily favoured Tamils and heavily discriminated against the Sinhalese.

Sri Lankans had to suffer the pain of terrorism for over 25 years and it is utter shame that countries such as UK and organisations such as UN are now trying to give a life line to the deadliest terror group in the world. If UN or UK are genuinely interested in human rights, then they should:
1. Ask LTTE to free the civilians
2. Ask LTTE to surrender
3. Provide technical assistance to Sri Lanka So that civilian casualties could be kept to a minimum
4. Provide technical assistance to Sri Lanka so that it is possible to distinguish the civilians from the terrorists
5. Provide technical assistance to disable terrorists
6. Stop funds flowing into LTTE offers
7. Stop propaganda and political activities of various LTTE fronts.
8. Instruct LTTE not to engage in military activities in the NFZ, not to take cover using civilians, not to fire at security forces from the NFZ.
9. Stop arms procurement by LTTE fronts.

At the moment Sri Lanka is trying to stop the insane terrorists and Sri Lanka should be allowed to finish the job. A generation of Sri Lankans of all ethnic groups have lost normal living due to terrorism. Sri Lanka should be allowed to finish off terrorism and get on with living. The countries that allowed terrorist fund raising should be invited to share the expenses for the care of disabled and orphans.

Remember forces lead by USA killed over 100000 Iraqi civilians as a result of the conflict in Iraq.
Sri Lanka has to explain the deadly nature of LTTE to the world, with appropriate evidence. It has to be clearly explained, with evidence, that no one in Sri Lanka would be safe if LTTE is allowed to exist as many suspect the mental state of Prabakaran.

As for Sri Lankan Tamils they are our brothers and sisters and we have a collective responsibility for each others safety and welfare.

Many suspect that LTTE has infiltrated UN.

The problem in Sri Lanka is mainly due to Tamil racism, that is trying to carve out a part of Sri Lanka to expand the Tamil Nadu state. LTTE is doing a ‘Hitler’. Many believe that the leader of LTTE is similar to Pol Pot and that LTTE is an extremely racist organisation. No one inb Sri Lanka would be safe if LTTE is allowed to survive. It is the responsibility of our missions abroad and also GoSL to explain to the world, the real threat faced by all Sri Lankans from LTTE and alsothe danger of giving a life line to LTTE.

Sri Lanka should have the right to safeguard its territory and the people from internationally funded, global racist terror organisations. Unless proper information is communicated to the world, the world may not understand the true situation faced by Sri Lanka. There is lot of scope for improvement in Communication skills of GoSL.

LTTE is holding civilians as hostages and as a human shield, and yet UN is inactive against LTTE. UN has failed to understand the nature of the conflict in Sri Lanka.

Unfortunately for Sri Lanka, Tamils such as Ms Coomaraswamy, who displays Tamil tribalism on her face is occupying a key position in UN.

Further the Human rights Chief of UN is yet another Tamil from South Africa. It is well known that South African Tamils are biased against Sri Lanka. Media reports have indicated that LTTE pilots may have been trained in South Africa.

I have to state that I consider Sri Lankan Tamils as part of the family and I have no issues with them. I am however concerned about the racist attitude of some Tamils with a Chola mentality.

The comments made by Ms Pillay show that she is biased against Sri Lanka and she should not deal with issues related to Sri Lanka.
These facts need to be drawn to the attention of world leaders immediately.

Why has the UN not taken any action against coalition forces, that killed over 100000 civilians in Iraq.? UN itself should be taken to task for taking no action against terrorists and terrorism. Is it because some key UN officials are Tamils and LTTE has infiltrated UN ?

Yours sincerely,
Ben Silva

References
1. Tiger Tax Part 1 http://www.mefeedia.com/entry/3398206/
2. Tiger Tax part 2 http://beta.muxlim.tv/video/JwY5whNFLjA
3. UK Double Standard Helps Terror Alastair Reynard Alastair Reynar http://www.lankaweb.com/news/items08/160608-3.html
4. Visa scam trio 'must pay £2.3m'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/6994087.stm
5. HAS LABOUR TOTALLY FAILED TO CONTROL IMMIGRATION? http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/31652/Has-Labour-totally-failed-to-control-immigration%3F/
6. Labour's left it too late to get a grip on immigration http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23575059-details/Labour's+left+it+too+late+to+get+a+grip+on+immigration/article.do
7. Real story behind Tamil tigers http://www.lankanewspapers.com/news/2008/2/24775_space.html
8. Violence of Tamil gangs revealed
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3096978.stm
9. Five US Citizens to claim asylum in UK , London lite 16 Oct 2006, Anna Davis 10. Jane's Sentinel examines the success of the LTTE http://www.janes.com/security/international_security/news/sentinel/sent000904_6_n.shtml

11. . Steve Moxon, ref: The Great Immigration Scandal, Steve Moxon, 2006, imprint Academic

So Much EU cared about Human Rights - demanded Cuba to release political dissidents while passed a law to jail illiegal immigrants for up to 18 mths

Castro condemns EU's 'hypocrisy'

Former Cuban President Fidel Castro has lashed out at the EU's decision to lift sanctions against his country, calling it "an enormous hypocrisy".


He said the move was "disparaging" because it was conditioned on human rights progress in Cuba.


The ailing 81-year-old said the measure came just days after the EU passed a "brutal" law that could jail illegal immigrants up to 18 months.


The EU lifted the sanctions against Cuba in principle on Thursday.


The decision is expected to come into formal effect on Monday. The EU said its move was aimed at encouraging change in Cuba, following Fidel Castro's replacement by his brother Raul in February.


The decades-old US trade embargo against Cuba remains in place.



EU warning


In an article published on Cuba's official website, Fidel Castro said he wanted "to put in writing my contempt for the enormous hypocrisy that surrounds the [EU] decision".


There will be very clear language also on what the Cubans still have to do

Benita Ferrero-Waldner
EU External Relations Commissioner

While saying that Cuba must improve its human rights record and free political prisoners, the EU mistreats illegal immigrants from Latin America by using the new law to jail and expel them, Mr Castro wrote.

"From Cuba, in the name of human rights, they demand impunity for those [dissidents] that try to deliver... the homeland and the people to imperialism," he said, referring to the US.

The EU sanctions were imposed in 2003 in protest at the Cuban government's imprisonment of more than 70 dissidents.

They included a limit on high-level government visits and the participation of EU diplomats in cultural events in Cuba.

But EU External Relations Commissioner Benita Ferrero-Waldner said on Thursday the EU would continue to monitor human rights conditions in Cuba.

"There will be very clear language also on what the Cubans still have to do... releasing prisoners, really working on human rights questions," she told reporters at an EU summit in Brussels.

The sanctions' removal is largely symbolic but still a success for Raul Castro's new government, analysts say.

Several leading Cuban dissidents have criticised the decision.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/americas/7466943.stm

So Much the US cared about Human Rights - OBAMA BOWS TO PRESSURE: Drops U.S. from Major Anti-Racism Conference

OBAMA BOWS TO PRESSURE: Drops U.S. from Major Anti-Racism Conference

http://eurweb.com/story/eur51521.cfm

Even with a Black man as president, the U.S. government appeared ready last week to bow to Jewish pressure and boycott a major international conference designed to combat racism.

The conference, informally known as the Durban Review, is scheduled for April with the aim of evaluating progress toward the goals of the 2001 “World Summit against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance.”

The 2001 Summit was held in Durban, South Africa. But under heavy pressure from American Jewish organizations and the state of Israel, the U.S. State Department announced last week that it will probably boycott the April gathering because preliminary documents unfairly criticize Israel’s continuing occupation of Palestinian lands and its often brutal and racist treatment of the Palestinian people.

The U.S. is also opposed to language which calls for reparations for slavery and Arab recommendations which it says might restrict freedom of speech.

Thus far the only nations which appear ready to follow the U.S. boycott are Israel and Canada. Several U.S. human rights groups are denouncing the U.S. boycott plans but led by the Anti-Defamation League, most major American Jewish organizations are applauding it. (source: Taylor Media Services)

So Much the West cared about Human Rights - Sinking the Boat People

December 9, 1989 New York Times

Sinking the Boat People

http://www.nytimes.com/1989/12/09/opinion/sinking-the-boat-people.html

Nothing is more unfashionable than yesterday's victims. This is the fate of more than 50,000 Vietnamese boat people now threatened with forced repatriation from refugee camps in Hong Kong. No longer ''victims of Communist tyranny,'' they are merely ''illegal immigrants,'' in the words of Prime Minister Thatcher of Britain. According to her Foreign Office, their return is not ''forced'' but ''involuntary.'' This nice distinction will bring no comfort to those about to be repatriated.

All told, 167,000 boat people have fled to Hong Kong since 1975, of whom around 112,000 have been resettled there and in other countries. Recent arrivals come mainly from Haiphong, a trip of three to seven days in fragile boats.

After accepting 10,000 Vietnamese in 1979 and 1980, Britain has found room for only hundreds each year. The United States has absorbed 50,316, but only about 800 in the last year. Meanwhile the exodus continues - 46,000 since June 1988, and hundreds more arrive every month.

There is no recent parallel for handing over so many unwilling people to a Communist state. A less recent parallel is disturbing: the forced return in 1945-46 to the Soviet bloc of hundreds of thousands of refugees, chiefly by the British. Most were killed or sent to labor camps. It was to prevent such cruelties that civilized states agreed to forbid the practice called refoulement.

In French that means forced return, a practice proscribed in article 33 of the United Nations Convention on refugees: ''No contracting state shall expel or return a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his life or freedom would be threatened on account of his race, religion, membership of a particular social group or political opinion.''

According to the British, nearly all the Vietnamese have been carefully screened by the U.N. and most cannot claim a well-founded fear of persecution. That is disputed by the respected Lawyers Committee on Human Rights. It regards the screening as biased and careless and contends the refugees are helpless to contest adverse findings.

The boat people do not share Britain's faith in Hanoi's avowals of decent treatment for returnees. As of September, only 264 Vietnamese elected voluntary repatriation, despite every inducement. Imagine what Charles Dickens might say about the silky assurance of a British civil servant that returning these people is ''a process of deportation which is used every day across the globe.''

Granted, the choices are difficult. Washington initially condemned forced repatriation as ''odious'' but is opening no doors, pointing out that America has already absorbed a million or so Indochinese refugees. The Lawyers Committee urges granting the boat people permanent asylum in labor-short Hong Kong. The U.S. Committee on Refugees urges, perhaps more realistically, a one-year grace period until the world comes up with a better solution.

The U.S., Britain and other countries in the region should be struggling to find one. That would sit easier on the conscience than idly watching as 50,000 refugees are forced from their refuge.

So much the UK cared about Human Rights in Sudan - Failed asylum seeker murdered after returning to Darfur

Adam Osman Mohammed, 32, was shot dead in his home in front of his wife and four-year-old son just days after arriving in south Darfur, it is claimed.

Mr Mohammed, a non-Arab Darfuri, came to Britain seeking sanctuary from persecution in Sudan, where he said his life was in danger.

The village where he was a farmer had been raided twice by the Janjaweed, the ethnic Arab militia, forcing him and his wife and child to flee their home.

Mr Mohammed became separated from his wife during a second attack on the village a few weeks later and escaped to Chad before making his way to the UK in 2005.

He lived in Birmingham for three years but his appeal for asylum was finally turned down last year and he returned to Darfur.

In August he was flown to Khartoum under the Home Office's assisted voluntary return programme, in which refugees are paid to go back to their country of origin.

He stayed in Khartoum for a few months and then, when he believed it was safe, he travelled to Darfur to be reunited with his family.

Mr Mohammed's cousin, Mohamed Elzaki Obubeker, who is chairman of the Darfur Union in the UK, said: "The government security forces had followed him to another village, Calgoo, where his wife and child had sought help. They came to the village to find him and then targeted him. They shot him in front of his wife and son."

The case is to be used by asylum campaigners to counter Home Office attempts to lift the ban on the removal and deportation to Sudan of failed asylum-seekers.

Waging Peace, the human rights campaign group which is to bring Mr Mohammed's case to the attention of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal in April, claims that people returning to Sudan face imprisonment, torture and death.

The group's director Louise Roland-Gosselin, told the Independent: "We are deeply concerned by what has happened to Adam and many like him.

"The Government still wants to send back Darfuri asylum-seekers. But it is difficult to understand on what basis the Government is making this decision.

"The International Criminal Court has issued a warrant for the arrest of Sudan's President, Omar al-Bashir, over murders committed during the genocide.

"It shows just how out of touch the Home Office is with the reality taking place in Khartoum if it thinks it's safe to send people back to a country where there is clear evidence of genocide."

A UK Border Agency spokesman said: "We consider every asylum application with the utmost care and, crucially, there is oversight from the independent courts. We are continuing to monitor the situation in Sudan, and in July last year we took the decision to stop returning non-Arab Darfuris until the courts decided it was safe to do so."

A source said that Mr Mohammed's case was twice turned down by the High Court at appeal and that he returned to Darfur "of his own volition".

So much the UK cared about Human Rights in Zimbabwe - UK sending 11 000 Mugabe refugees back



Summary :

Jun 23, 2008 / Guardian /
US and Britain: Mugabe's Zimbabwe 'not legitimate'
July 06, 2008 /
Mail & Guardian Online / UK sending 11 000 Mugabe refugees back
July 12, 2008 / Mail Online / UK condemnation as Russia and China veto sanctions on Zimbabwe's Mugabe regime

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

US and Britain: Mugabe's Zimbabwe 'not legitimate'

guardian.co.uk, Monday 23 June 2008 11.32 BST

Mark Tran, Peter Walker, Julian Borger and agencies

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/23/zimbabwe5

The US and Britain today led international condemnation of Zimbabwe by urging countries not to recognise Robert Mugabe's "criminal and discredited cabal".

Mugabe is expected to come under strong diplomatic pressure when the UN security council meets later today. Ahead of the meeting, US and British officials stepped up their criticism of the 84-year-old Zimbabwean president.

The US secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, said that, without a proper election process, Mugabe's government could not be considered legitimate and should be condemned "in the strongest possible terms".

In similar comments, Gordon Brown, told MPs he had spoken to Morgan Tsvangirai, the opposition leader today, adding that he would push for more sanctions against the Mugabe government.

"The international community must send a powerful and united message: that we will not recognise the fraudulent election rigging and violence and intimidation of a criminal and discredited cabal," the prime minister said.

"The world is of one view: that the status quo cannot continue."

As international leaders denounced Mugabe, Tsvangirai, the head of the Movement for Democratic Change, sought refuge in the Dutch embassy in Harare amid escalating violence orchestrated by the ruling Zanu-PF party.

The Dutch foreign ministry, in The Hague, confirmed that Tsvangirai was "temporarily" sheltering at the embassy for safety.

Maxime Verhagen, the Dutch foreign minister, had agreed to a request for shelter from Tsvangirai's party, a spokesman told AFP.

The spokesman added that Tsvangirai was "currently reflecting on what the next step should be".

Tsvangirai yesterday announced he was withdrawing from this week's scheduled run-off vote against Mugabe, saying he did not want to put the lives of his supporters at risk.

An estimated 100 opposition activists have been murdered by security forces and militia connected to Zanu-PF, and thousands of MDC supporters have been raped and tortured.

Earlier today, riot police raided the MDC headquarters in Harare, taking away up to 60 people, a witness quoted by AFP said.

Mark Malloch-Brown, Brown's Africa minister, said Britain planned to argue at the UN that Mugabe "no longer remains the proper rightful leader of the country".

Much could depend on the reaction of Zimbabwe's neighbours. South Africa's president, Thabo Mbeki, has faced intense international criticism for failing to use what influence he has on Mugabe's regime to try and rein in anti-opposition violence.

The African Union expressed its "grave concern" at the situation. The union was closely monitoring events following Tsvangirai's announcement, Jean Ping, chairman of the executive arm, the African Union commission, said.

The union was holding talks with a mediation team led by Mbeki, to see how it could help, he added. Despite Tsvangirai's decision to drop out, the ruling Zanu-PF party has promised it will go ahead with Friday's vote.

Mugabe's justice minister, Patrick Chinamasa, ridiculed Tsvangirai's announcement. "Zanu-PF is not treating the threats seriously - it is a nullity," Chinamasa was quoted as saying by today's edition of the Herald newspaper, a government mouthpiece.

"We are proceeding with our campaign to romp to victory on Friday."
After the MDC leadership met yesterday it said it was withdrawing from a "violent, illegitimate sham of an election".

"Mugabe has declared war, and we will not be part of that war," Tsvangirai said.

"The militia, war veterans and even Mugabe himself have made it clear that anyone that votes for me in the forthcoming election faces the very real possibility of being killed.

"We in the MDC cannot ask them to cast their vote on June 27 when that vote could cost them their lives. We believe a credible election, which reflects the will of the people, is impossible."

Speaking on South Africa's Radio 702 today, Tsvangirai said he was willing to begin talks with Zanu-PF, but only if the violence ended.

"We are prepared to negotiate with Zanu-PF, but of course it is important that certain principles are accepted before the negotiations take place," he added. "One of the preconditions is that this violence against the people must be stopped."

According to contested official results, Tsvangirai won more votes than Mugabe in an initial presidential election on March 29, but did not gain enough for an outright win.




---------------------------------------------------------------------------

UK sending 11 000 Mugabe refugees back

Jul 06 2008 06:53

http://www.mg.co.za/article/2008-07-06-uk-sending-11-000-mugabe-refugees-back

Attempts by British Prime Minister Gordon Brown to use a meeting of G8 leaders this week to campaign for tougher action against Zimbabwe are in danger of being undermined by claims that Britain is forcing as many as 11 000 Zimbabweans seeking refuge in the country to make a stark choice between destitution or returning home to possible torture or death. Letters obtained by the Observer show that the Home Office continues to order failed Zimbabwean asylum seekers to return home in the face of mounting violence.

A removal letter, sent at the end of May to an exiled London-based member of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change, states: "The support that you have been provided with is to be discontinued ... You should note that there is no right to appeal against this decision ... You must now leave the United Kingdom."

The letter, which refugee groups say has been sent to hundreds of Zimbabweans in the past few months, continues: "As a failed asylum seeker you are expected to make arrangements to leave the United Kingdom without delay."

The letter's recipient, a man who asked not to be named for fear it would jeopardise his safety if he is forced to return to Zimbabwe, said that he had been tortured by President Robert Mugabe's Zanu-PF party. "I have to report to the Home Office every two weeks but I haven't got any money to pay the travel costs," he said.

The majority of Zimbabweans in the UK are too scared to return. As a result, refugee groups and charities say many Zimbabwean asylum seekers are now destitute and relying on friends and charity.

"These letters are shameful," said Donna Covey, chief executive of the Refugee Council. "It is appalling that the government is continuing to order Zimbabweans to go back to Zimbabwe, especially under the current circumstances, and basically leaving them to starve if they don't."

She said: "It is scarcely believable that even now, when there can be no questioning of the atrocities being committed by Mugabe's regime, people asking for safety here are being turned away."

John Waite, co-chairperson of the Independent Asylum Commission, which has just published a report on the asylum system in the UK, described the situation as a source of shame.

He said: "We heard testimony from many Zimbabwean asylum seekers and we were shocked by what we found -- Zimbabweans sleeping on sofas, in parks and launderettes, reliant on charity and prevented from working."



He added: "Our nation's leaders have loudly condemned the Mugabe regime, but perhaps we should also look a little closer to home, to the thousands of Zimbabwean asylum seekers who have been left in a harsh legal limbo -- unable to work, deprived of welfare and unable to return home. If the British people had heard what we have heard from destitute Zimbabweans, they would be troubled and perhaps even ashamed."

The Home Office won a legal ruling earlier in the year giving it the power to send Zimbabweans home. But the ruling, the result of a three-year legal battle, was disputed by refugee groups.

Last week the Court of Appeal adjourned the case, a move that has meant thousands of Zimbabweans continue to be left without benefits. "The hidden consequence of this decision is that up to 11 000 refused Zimbabwean asylum seekers will be left destitute, not given any support or accommodation and at risk of prosecution if they work to support themselves, so that some are forced to beg and sleep rough," said Caroline Slocock, chief executive of the Refugee Legal Centre.

Nick Scott-Flynn, head of refugee services at the Red Cross, estimates a tenth of the 10 000 refugees his organisation helps in the UK each year are Zimbabwean.

"Many are petrified about going back," he said. "They are in limbo -- not allowed to work and not allowed to receive benefits. The consequences of this policy is causing a lot of needless suffering, and there is no evidence it is encouraging people to return home."

Marilyn Bonzo, who is seeking asylum in the UK after being accused of supporting the MDC, is one Zimbabwean living in destitution. "I now live on the charity of my British friends and food that the Red Cross give me," she said.

This week Britain is to lead calls urging G8 countries not to recognise the re-election of Mugabe and to consider tighter sanctions against his regime. In April, Brown said: "I am appalled by the signs that the regime is once again resorting to intimidation and violence."

But Covey said the government's policy on Zimbabwe was contradictory. "What people find bewildering is the disconnect between what the government says in regards to its foreign policy and its immigration policy," she said. "The Home Office has got very expensive lawyers trying to deport opposition activists, and the message going back to Zimbabwe is that the UK is not a safe haven."

Refugee support groups are now calling on the government urgently to relax the rules barring Zimbabwean asylum seekers from working. The Foreign Office minister, Malloch Brown, recently hinted this was a proposal being considered by the government.

A UK Border Agency spokesperson said that, although the agency was sending out letters ordering failed Zimbabwean asylum seekers to return home, it had no plans to start forced removals. "We always seek to assist anyone who wishes to return," she said. -

guardian.co.uk © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2008

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

UK condemnation as Russia and China veto sanctions on Zimbabwe's Mugabe regime

By Ian Drury
Last updated at 4:52 PM on 12th July 2008

  • http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1034529/UK-condemnation-Russia-China-veto-sanctions-Zimbabwes-Mugabe-regime.html

Robert Mugabe

Russia and China rejected a draft resolution to impose restrictions on Robert Mugabe and 13 of his henchmen

Foreign Secretary David Miliband has condemned Russia and China for blocking international sanctions against Robert Mugabe's regime.

He said he was 'very disappointed' that the two super-powers had prevented the United Nations taking action to punish the murderous Zimbabwean president.

Russia and China risked sparking outrage by flatly rejecting a draft resolution which would have imposed an arms embargo on Zimbabwe, as well as financial and travel restrictions on Mugabe and 13 of his henchmen.

The move was a devastating and embarrassing blow for Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who thought he had gained sufficient backing for the U.N. Security Council motion after Zimbawe's recent elections were marred by violence.

On Tuesday, he appeared to have pulled off a remarkable coup at the G8 summit in Japan by persuading Russia - which traditionally opposes interference in the affairs of other nations - to join in condemnation of the tyrant.

But in a controversial move which led to angry recriminations, Moscow sabotaged the imposition of sanctions by using its veto.

Downing Street described the result as a 'missed opportunity' for the people of the former British colony, but said today it would not rule out a renewed attempt to get a Security Council resolution if efforts to deliver a mediated settlement failed to make progress.

'It is disappointing that the Security Council failed to stand up for the democratic rights of Zimbabweans. But it was right to push for a tough Security Council resolution, and those who stood in its way must now take responsibility for the failure of the Security Council to act," a No 10 spokesman said.

'We will continue to stand firmly for human rights and democracy, and will return to the Security Council in the absence of early progress on mediation, humanitarian access and an end to violence.

'This is not the outcome we sought, but we have other options.'

The spokesman said that Britain would continue to press UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to send a special envoy to Zimbabwe, while pushing for further EU measures against the regime.

Mr Miliband said people in the beleaguered African nation, which has been pushed to the brink of civil war as millions endure starvation and violence, would find the U.N. vote 'incomprehensible'.

He said: 'I am very disappointed that the UN Security Council should have failed to pass a strong and clear resolution on Zimbabwe.

'In particular, it will appear incomprehensible to the people of Zimbabwe that Russia, which committed itself at the G8 only a few days ago to take further steps including introducing financial and other sanctions, should today stand in the way of timely and decisive security council action.

'Nor will they understand the Chinese vote.'

He added: 'All of our efforts will continue to be directed at alleviating the suffering of Zimbabweans. The violence against them must stop.'

Shadow foreign secretary William Hague said it was now clear that Mr Brown had been 'over-confident' when he claimed a "major breakthrough" on sanctions at the G8.

He said that Britain now needed to find other ways of bringing pressure to bear on the Mugabe regime.

'The excuse given by Russia and China, that the issue is no threat to world stability, does not hold water when millions of Zimbabwean refugees have fled to neighbouring countries,' he said.

'It is becoming ever clearer that the 'responsibility to protect' which all nations agreed to at the last UN summit is a totally meaningless concept to some of them.

'The British Government should now look at whether a grouping of EU, Commonwealth and southern African nations could co-ordinate their own version of the pressure the UN has failed to apply.

'Above all, this huge setback cannot be the end of the matter. The people of Zimbabwe are suffering oppression, violence and poverty on a scale the world cannot be allowed to ignore.'

Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman Edward Davey said that the Government needed to find a way to get South African President Thabo Mbeki to take a firmer line with Mr Mugabe.

"President Mbeki has always held the key and now is the time to increase pressure on him. We need to talk to and support those political voices in South Africa who want to end the oppression in Zimbabwe," he said.

Britain's Ambassador to the U.N., Sir John Sawers, said the Security Council had 'failed to shoulder its responsibility to do what it can to prevent a national tragedy deepening and spreading its effects across southern Africa'.

David Miliband

Foreign Secretary David Miliband has condemned Russia and China's decision to block the U.N. Security Council motion as "incomprehensible"

He added: 'The people of Zimbabwe need to be given hope that there is an end in sight to their suffering. The Security Council today has failed to offer them that hope.'

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Zalmay Khalilzad said Russia's U-turn over Zimbabwe was 'disturbing' and raised questions about its 'reliability as a G8 partner'.

But Russian ambassador Vitaly Churkin said sanctions would have taken the U.N. beyond its mandate to deal with threats to international peace and security.

The resolution - which included the appointment of a special U.N envoy to Zimbabwe - won the backing of nine of the 15 council members, the minimum required to pass it.

But crucially China - Zimbabwe's biggest trading partner - and Russia both used their vetos to defeat the motion and scupper sanctions.

They were joined by South Africa, whose president Thabo Mbeki's refusal to take a strong stance against Mugabe has infuriated Western nations, Libya and Vietnam.

The other three members with veto power, Britain, the U.S. and France, called for sanctions to pile pressure on Mugabe after violence and intimidation marred Zimbabwe's recent discredited presidential election.

The leader of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change, Morgan Tsvangirai, won the first round of Zimbabwe's presidential elections on March 29.

Official results gave him less than the 50 per cent share needed to seize power so a run-off was called.

But Mr Tsvangirai pulled out of the poll after many of his supporters suffered violence and brutality at the hands of Mugabe's militia, leaving the tyrant to declare victory at the end of last month.

In the wake of Mugabe 'stealing' the election, Britain upped the demand for G8 leaders to back tougher penalties against the dictator.

During this week's summit Mr Brown used horrific photographs of the tortured and burned body of an opposition party worker in Zimbabwe to unite world leaders in condemnation of Mugabe.

His highly-unusual decision to show the graphic images to other world leaders appeared to have got results as Russia surprisingly agreed to fresh action. Last night the move backfired.

In a statement to the U.N., Zimbabwe called the proposed sanctions 'escalatory and tragic'

It added: 'The situation in Zimbabwe does not warrant the attention that it is getting. Zimbabwe's quarrel with Britain is purely bilateral and has no place on the UN Security Council agenda.'