Friday, July 3, 2009

So Much the UK cares about Human Rights - Life with a Control Order : A wife's story

Life with a control order: a wife's story

Mahmoud Abu Rideh has spent four years behind bars and another four years on a control order. A father of six, he is in a wheelchair and has never seen the evidence against him. Today he goes to the High Court, backed by Amnesty International, in a plea to leave Britain. Here Dina Al Jnidi, his wife, describes the family's descent into a nightmare

Friday, 3 July 2009

The family of Mahmoud Abu Rideh campaign for his freedom The family of Mahmoud Abu Rideh campaign for his freedom


It is still fresh in my mind the day the police came to arrest my husband – it was the 19 December 2001. They broke down the door and forced their way into our home while I was still in my night dress. They were pointing their guns in my face and in the children's faces. There were about 30 armed officers. They forced my husband to the floor and handcuffed him, pressing down on his back and neck with their knees as he screamed in pain. They yelled: "Shut up you f***ing terrorist!" I implored the police to stop because my husband suffers from back pain. All this was in view of my children who were terrified; they were crying, shaking, many had wet themselves .

The police took my husband away – to where, I do not know. They took me and my children to a hostel; they wanted to search our home.

After two days we were allowed to return home. The local newspaper had taken pictures of our house. The headlines read something like: "Terrorist raid". After this article I had my face veil forcibly removed three times. We also had rubbish thrown at our front door.

Forty days passed and I still did not know where my husband was. I called the police, immigration – no one told me where he was.

Eventually I swapped my home because our neighbours had resorted to spitting at me. Prior to the arrest of my husband and the raid on our home, we had never had any trouble with our neighbours. The police have caused this problem which led to our victimisation.

I finally found out my husband was in Belmarsh prison and I went to visit him there. I discovered he was on a hunger strike. The visit was a closed visit, which means that neither I nor my children could touch him. The children were unable to hug or hold their father. Even shaking his hand was not allowed. On many occasions after travelling long distances in difficult circumstances we were sent away without being allowed to see him. My husband does not speak English well, but he was not allowed to speak Arabic (eventually this was allowed for one visit out of four).

My husband used to call and often he would be crying due to the torture and the discrimination he was facing. My children, too, would cry. The effect of all this torture, discrimination, and detention without charge or trial drove my husband insane, angry and psychologically mad. Never before was he like this, he was a normal person – a normal husband and a normal father. Due to his mental state he was transferred to Broadmoor psychiatric hospital, a place for dangerous high-risk people.

While at Broadmoor, he was frequently attacked by staff, nurses and other prisoners. I could not visit him there. I tried, but whenever I went I was told he was in isolation, in solitary confinement.

Broadmoor was far from our home, it was difficult travelling with five children only to be sent home.

It was around this time that my husband began to self-harm. He drank detergents, he used pens to dig deep into his arms.

He was finally released in 2005. We were given only two hours' notice before his return. We were pleased to have him back home, but did not know the full extent of the conditions that would be placed on him. I did not know what a control order was. He had to wear an electronic tag around his ankle. He had to report in several times a day (including the middle of the night) using special equipment that had been placed in our home. We were not allowed to have a digital camera in the home, nor other basic items such as USB sticks, memory cards or MP3 players. Our children were not allowed to use the internet or have a computer. We were not allowed visitors unless they had been cleared by the Home Office after a rigorous vetting procedure. Many would not even call for fear of being harassed by the police or worse.

My husband was a wreck, a shattered man. He could not sleep, he would sweat and shake, he would have nightmares and flashbacks. It was almost impossible to deal with him. He was ill and had complex psychological needs – I am not a trained nurse and he required specialist help. One week later he attempted suicide by taking an overdose of his depression and anti-psychotic medications. I found him on the floor unconscious, in a pool of vomit foam coming from his mouth. He was taken to the hospital and remained unconscious for three days.

My life is ruined. I cannot sleep. I cry so much. It is having an effect on my children. I blame Tony Blair, the House of Lords, the Queen, the politicians, Parliament. They all have a have a hand in this. I am British. So are my children. Why, then, is it acceptable for us to be treated in this manner? The police came many times to search my house, violating the sanctity that is a home. What do they expect to find among my clothes and my children's clothes? They confiscated money, a Nintendo Wii, a Playstation, a PSP. The Nintendo Wii was a gift from my husband's solicitor to our children. Despite numerous requests, none of these items have been returned to us. Why? Are my children not allowed the things everyone else's children are?

Even irrelevant documents have been confiscated – birth certificates, school reports, a car log book and MOT certificates. Of what significance or benefit are these?

I was at breaking point. I could take no more. I was pregnant with my sixth child. During my pregnancy the Home Office made things difficult – I could not get help as people required clearance before being allowed to visit me. How could I care for a sick husband and five children while pregnant?

I want to know how the majority of Christians in Britain prepare and share joy at the christening of their newborn children. Am I exempt from sharing my happiness with friends and family? Should I too not be allowed to show off my precious gift to others? Am I subhuman? I want to ask the politicians, the Queen – would this not affect you?

I tried to remain hopeful many times. But there is no hope. My husband has been charged with no crime, he has not been interviewed or interrogated. He has been presumed guilty because he is Muslim – for what other reason could it be? Please explain to me and my family – why have we had to endure this treatment? Pets are treated better than we have been. Is this the humanity you profess, is this the justice you want to spread?

Judge Ousley ordered and ruled that the Home Office should release the secret evidence that is held against my husband. But the Home Office appealed this decision and it has been a long time and nothing has been heard or seen.

On or around the 19 February this year, the European Courts of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights declared that the secret evidence being used against my husband be released to him and his solicitors. They said the control order should be lifted and that my husband should receive compensation for his unfair treatment. What is the point of these courts if Britain makes a mockery of them and refuses to submit to their judgment?

There is no justice. We have lost all hope of justice.

My family, especially our children, are scared of the police. The have suffered at the hands of the police. Their education has suffered. They have not been able to complete homework, they are at a disadvantage compared to other children as they are not allowed to access the internet. I have three girls in secondary school and three boys in primary school. I was attending college to study childcare. We all require a computer.

My husband was re-arrested for alleged breaches of his control order on at least four different occasions. Once he was arrested for having the Nintendo Wii which was the gift to our children. Once it was for having "mobile phones" in the home – they were actually toys purchased from the pound shop.

We, as a family, are dead. We are sick of the police and the Government's torture of our family that has gone on for eight years. Our family has been held hostage in Britain. My husband and I escaped torture at the hand of the Israelis to find worse torture in the UK. I now find myself in another country – J ordan – where I have sought asylum from the torture that Britain has placed me and my family under.

Psychiatrists from the Home Office advised me to divorce my husband, saying it would be better for me and my children. Scotland Yard on many occasions also told me this. What kind of twisted advice is this? Would this really be better for me and my children? Or are they looking for more reasons to drive my husband to suicide?

I have too many things to get off my chest. My heart is filled with anger. I am crying as I write this – it is all too much for me to remember. I have left my home to be in Jordan. My husband was not even allowed to accompany us to the airport. He is forbidden under the restrictions of his control order. Is it really likely that he can escape; he has no passport, no travel documents – where would he go?

As we left our home I knew, and he knew, that it was probably the last time we would see each other, the last time he would see, hold, hug and kiss his children. I had to watch my children crying at the thought of never seeing their father again. But I have no choice, I have been forced to leave.

Perhaps now I can try to repair the damage to my children; the emotional scars they will bear for how long I do not know. I can finally try to rid myself of the effects of the "Terrorist Act", the police, the searches and the torture I have had to witness my husband go through.

I still fear for my husband who is alone. He has made four suicide attempts – each time he has been serious. But Allah has not willed that he be successful.

The British public and Government complain about the effects of immigration and asylum seekers in the UK, about people coming to the country and claiming benefits. Why then do you force my husband to remain here? He has not been charged or convicted of a crime, yet you treat him this way .

I would like to tell the British Government and the rest of the world, I would like to tell anyone who has a heart, anyone who has an ounce of humanity – please allow my husband to leave the United Kingdom.

Please provide him with the necessary documents to go to any country, where there may be at least some hope of seeing him again – before I lose him for good and our children lose their father.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/life-with-a-control-order-a-wifes-story-1729620.html

Monday, April 13, 2009

So Much the US cared about Human Rights : Citizens held as illegal immigrants

AP IMPACT: Citizens held as illegal immigrants

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090413/ap_on_re_us/mistaken_for_illegal_i/print

Pedro Guzman has been an American citizen all his life. Yet in 2007, the 31-year-old Los Angeles native — in jail for a misdemeanor, mentally ill and never able to read or write — signed a waiver agreeing to leave the country without a hearing and was deported to Mexico as an illegal immigrant.

For almost three months, Guzman slept in the streets, bathed in filthy rivers and ate out of trash cans while his mother scoured the city of Tijuana, its hospitals and morgues, clutching his photo in her hand. He was finally found trying to cross the border at Calexico, 100 miles away.

These days, back home in California, "He just changes from one second to another. His brain jumps back to when he was missing," said his brother, Michael Guzman. "We just talk to him and reassure him that everything is fine and nobody is going to hurt him."

In a drive to crack down on illegal immigrants, the United States has locked up or thrown out dozens, probably many more, of its own citizens over the past eight years. A monthslong AP investigation has documented 55 such cases, on the basis of interviews, lawsuits and documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. These citizens are detained for anything from a day to five years. Immigration lawyers say there are actually hundreds of such cases.

It is illegal to deport U.S. citizens or detain them for immigration violations. Yet citizens still end up in detention because the system is overwhelmed, acknowledged Victor Cerda, who left Immigration and Customs Enforcement in 2005 after overseeing the system. The number of detentions overall is expected to rise by about 17 percent this year to more than 400,000, putting a severe strain on the enforcement network and legal system.

The result is the detention of citizens with the fewest resources: the mentally ill, minorities, the poor, children and those with outstanding criminal warrants, ranging from unpaid traffic tickets to failure to show up for probation hearings. Most at risk are Hispanics, who made up the majority of the cases the AP found.

"The more the system becomes confused, the more U.S. citizens will be wrongfully detained and wrongfully removed," said Bruce Einhorn, a retired immigration judge who now teaches at Pepperdine Law School. "They are the symptom of a larger problem in the detention system. ... Nothing could be more regrettable than the removal of our fellow citizens."

Jim Hayes, ICE director of detention and removal, said he is aware of only 10 cases of U.S. citizens detained over the past five years. Even if combined with the cases found by the AP, "that's not an epidemic," Hayes said. He refused to identify any cases, citing privacy laws.

He added that agents investigate any claims to U.S. citizenship, but they often turn out to be false. He said U.S. citizens sometimes claim to be foreign-born, and that immigration officials never knowingly hold someone they can "definitively" determine is a citizen.

It's impossible to know exactly how many citizens have been detained or deported because nobody keeps track. Kara Hartzler, an attorney at the Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project in Arizona, testified at a U.S. House hearing last year that her group alone sees 40 to 50 jailings a month of people with potentially valid claims to citizenship.

"These cases are surprisingly, painfully common," she said.

The nonprofit Vera Institute for Justice found 322 people with citizenship claims in 13 immigration prisons in 2007, up from 129 the year before. That number does not include possible citizens in the nation's more than 300 other immigration prisons.

What is clear is that immigration detentions — including those of citizens — have soared in recent years. One reason is a heightened concern for security that arose out of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Another is a political climate that encouraged a tough stance on illegal immigration, especially after Congress failed to pass immigration reform legislation almost three years ago.

After 2003, the nation launched several programs to detain more immigrants, including one that called on local police and sheriffs for help. Before 2007, just seven state and local law enforcement agencies worked with immigration. By last November, more than 950 officers from 23 states had attended a four-week program on how to root out and jail suspected illegal immigrants.

A Government Accountability Office investigation has since found that ICE did not ensure local officials properly used their authority and failed to collect data to assess the program. As a result, ICE is rewriting agreements with 67 agencies.

The program came under fire partly because it gives local officers so much leeway to decide who to stop. Almost one in 10 Hispanic adults born in the U.S. report that police or other authorities stopped them and asked about their immigration status in 2007, according to a Pew Hispanic Center survey of more than 2,000 people.

___

It was a local sheriff's office that sent Guzman out of the country.

He was picked up near his home in Lancaster, Calif., on March 31, 2007, by Los Angeles County sheriff's department officers on a misdemeanor trespassing charge. He had tried three times to board a private plane, showing lottery tickets for passage on one attempt, officers said in a report. He had also stolen a car and told officers his mother's car was broken.

A judge gave him three years' probation and three months in jail for vandalism.

At the jail, Guzman told officers he was born in California, a response noted in official records. But a sheriff's employee still got Guzman to sign an agreement to leave the country without a hearing.

On the day he arrived in Mexico, Guzman called a relative to say he didn't know where he was, and asked a passer-by. The answer: Tijuana. Then the phone cut off.

Guzman was finally returned to California legally in August 2007.

Now he can no longer stand the sun because it reminds him of Mexico. His family will not let him talk about the ordeal because it upsets him. He has frequent counseling sessions, but he is shaky, stutters and seems to hear voices, according to his brother.

"He is our brother, somebody's son, that they deported," said Michael Guzman. "California is like the main capital of Latin Americans. It doesn't matter whether you are a citizen or not. If you look Hispanic, they can question you. Deportation can happen to anybody."

Neither the sheriff's office nor immigration officials would discuss the case, citing pending litigation. The family has sued Los Angeles County and the federal government.

"When the whole story is told, people will see and understand what has occurred," said Steve Whitmore, spokesman for the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office.

In the meantime, Guzman's mother, Maria Carbajal, often works the graveyard shift at a Jack in the Box because she is afraid to leave him alone during the day.

___

American citizens also have been caught in the net of increased workplace arrests and jail sweeps.

Workplace arrests rose from 517 in fiscal year 2003 to 6,274 in 2008. Julie Myers, former Homeland Security assistant secretary overseeing ICE, said agents quickly sort out which workers are citizens during raids. She added that federal law, court decisions and search warrants give immigration agents the authority to enter workplaces to question everyone inside, including citizens.

But the raids have already led to several lawsuits.

In 2007, 114 U.S. citizens and permanent residents sued after a raid on Micro Solutions Enterprises, a computer printer equipment recycler in Van Nuys, Calif. They alleged illegal detention and sought $5,000 damage each.

In 2008, the union representing workers at six Swift & Co. meatpacking plants sued on behalf of eight citizens and legal residents caught up in raids.

In one case, three citizens and nine others, all Hispanic, sued after ICE agents raided their New Jersey homes as part of what was dubbed Operation Return To Sender. The lawsuit alleges that an immigration agent pulled a gun on one of the citizens, a 9-year-old boy.

A program to sweep jails and deport immigrants who have committed crimes is more popular. But critics fear the temptation is to deport anyone for anything because they are seen as bad seeds, even if they are American citizens.

___

Rennison Castillo arrived early at the Seattle immigration office on Oct. 28, 1998, to take his citizenship oath. He was dressed in a freshly starched Army uniform and was eager to grab a good seat. He sat in the second row.

Born in Belize, Castillo had lived in the U.S. since he was 7 and had served two years in the Army. But his superiors told him he could not stay in the Army without citizenship. So he took the citizenship test and passed easily, missing only one question, on the name of a locally elected official.

"I felt pretty good. I felt I definitely accomplished something, because having a citizenship to the United States was something that I felt proud of," Castillo said.

Seven years later, the U.S. government locked Castillo in a Tacoma, Wash., immigration jail. He had been picked up at the Pierce County jail, where he had spent eight months for violating a restraining order and for residential burglary.

At the holding cell, an officer asked if he wanted to go home. He thought she meant his home in Lakewood, Wash. "Yes," he answered. "I'd love to go home."

She chained him up and told him he would be deported.

Over and over, Castillo said, he told officers he was a citizen. He pleaded with them to check their computer files.

But officials said nothing in their records confirmed his citizenship or his military service. One officer actually recognized Castillo from their Army days at Fort Lewis, Wash., and mentioned their battalion, but told Castillo he couldn't help.

Then Castillo saw a number posted on the wall for the Northwest Immigration Rights Project. On the group's advice, he contacted a friend who pulled his military document from the trunk of his car.

Nearly eight months after he was transferred to ICE custody, Castillo was released. He discovered that immigration officials had two files on him, with different numbers, and has since filed a lawsuit. ICE declined to comment because the lawsuit is pending.

"I understand that nothing is perfect, nothing will be perfect, but I don't understand how they could make a grave mistake like that," he said. "Because if this happened to me, I'm quite sure it's happened to somebody else. What's going to happen to the next person it happens to?"

___

For Ricardo Martinez, born in McAllen, Texas, it was not being able to get back into his own country.

Even though he was a U.S. citizen, Martinez lived in Mexico between the ages of 5 and 17.

Like many border residents with family on the other side, he made frequent trips to Mexico. When he tried to return to the U.S. after a visit to Mexico in July 1999, he was turned away by border officers at Nogales, Ariz., because two copies of his birth certificate, issued years apart, had different hospital registration dates. Not proficient in English, Martinez said he had never noticed the error.

Told to get his documents in order, he got a U.S. passport and was able to get into the country. But the problem was not over.

In January 2006, he went back to Mexico to be with his dying grandmother. When he tried to cross back at Laredo, Texas, in March, he carried his birth certificates, his birth registration card, his passport and state ID cards from Nebraska, California and Texas, where he had worked.

But by that time border security had become far stricter. Agents looked up Martinez in their database and found the earlier problem at Nogales. They claimed his U.S. passport was fake, he said.

Martinez was taken to an inspection room, forced to remove his shoes, searched, handcuffed to a chair and held for two hours while officers questioned his documents, he said. He was told unless he confessed to fraud, he would be sent to prison for six to eight months, according to a court document filed in Martinez's lawsuit against the government.

"They told me if I didn't say I was from over there, they would put me in jail. I was frightened," Martinez said.

He said he asked to call his mother to help prove his citizenship, but was refused.

Martinez's stepfather, Florentino Mireles, said in a Feb. 27, 2008, affidavit that he called border inspectors to ask why they had taken Martinez's documents. The response, he said: An officer didn't believe Martinez was a U.S. citizen because he didn't speak English.

Afraid of jail, Martinez signed the papers. In an affidavit in his lawsuit, Martinez said he didn't understand that by signing he was admitting to not being born in the U.S.

It took his parents two years to find an affordable attorney. Finally, at a meeting in Hidalgo, attorney Lisa Brodyaga showed border officers a copy of Martinez' birth certificate from his parents that included his footprints and a thumbprint and tax records showing he had worked legally in the U.S. Officials agreed he was a U.S. citizen and allowed him to cross the border.

Lloyd Easterling, spokesman for Customs and Border Protection, declined comment because Martinez has sued. In court filings, the agency said Martinez denied being physically assaulted or subjected to excessive force and never filed a complaint against the officers.

Brodyaga said the cases of U.S. citizens detained or deported show more than bureaucratic bungling.

"I've been doing this for 30 years and I've seen bureaucratic bungling. This is more than that," she said. "This is an atmosphere of suspicion and hostility, particularly for Mexican-Americans on the border."

___

Associated Press staff writers Traci Carl and Peter Prengaman contributed to this report.

Sunday, March 29, 2009

So Much Germany cared about Human Rights - Children from across Eastern Europe are being sold for sex, mostly to Germans, in a network of sex "bazaars

Children from across Eastern Europe are being sold for sex, mostly to Germans, in a network of sex "bazaars" along the border between Germany and the Czech Republic, says a UNICEF report. In many cases, the children are sold into prostitution by their own families.

They come from all regions of Germany, men ranging in age from 18 to 80, travelling alone in expensive cars that cross into the Czech Republic. Their destination is just beyond the border: bus stops, service stations
and rest areas that form the epicentre of a child prostitution ring that one official calls the biggest brothel in Europe.

A new report from the United Nations organization for children (UNICEF) says the German-Czech border has become a haven for pedophilia, with desperately poor families on the Czech side selling their children into
sex slavery and tens of thousands of Germans paying for access to children as young as eight, some of whom are paid with candy.

"The Czech Republic is becoming a discount market for sex with children," said Adolf Gallwitz, a German police psychologist. Mr. Gallwitz said pedophilia in the southeast German border regions of Bavaria and Saxony is increasing "at an incredible rate," and he estimated 50,000 Germans visit the Czech Republic's burgeoning sex tourism industry.

The author of the UNICEF report, Cathrin Schauer, said areas such as bus stops and service stations near the border have been converted into "bazaars" where child prostitutes are bought and sold.

full story: http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/thomas100806.htm

Paedophiles, Cheb sex capital of Europe

Captive market:
The sexual slave traffic in children

By Gordon Thomas

Sunday, October 8, 2006

It was dusk when the BMWs and Mercedes once more began to enter Cheb on Christmas Eve, 2004. By midnight, the expensive cars cruised its streets. The town is on the Czech-German border, a crossing point on the highway that leads to Prague from Bavaria and Saxony.

Cheb is a mecca for German paedophiles who come to this drab town, with its ugly Stalinist-era apartment blocks and poorly-lit back streets for one purpose.

Every night, since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Cheb has maintained its reputation as the child sex capital of Europe. These include what are known as "the specials": children so small, so vulnerable, so fragile, that they cannot solicit for themselves. They are offered to the drivers of those cars by their "keepers". This is the shame of Czechoslovakia, a country that now prides itself on having a future in the European Community.

For the equivalent of US $50 a paedophile can take his pick of children often barely out of their diapers.

They are the ultimate degradation for a town of 38,000 people. With over 100 brothels, no one knows exactly how many young prostitutes work in them or on the streets of Cheb.

On New Year's Day, 2004, Europe's newspapers reported the latest child-sex scandal. A former Portuguese cabinet minister tipped to lead his socialist party, Paulo Pedroso, and a former ambassador to South Africa, Jorge Ritto, along with eight others, including a doctor and two television presenters, were all charged with sexually abusing minors.

Outside Portugal most newspapers gave little space to the revelations. They have become all too commonplace.

The allegedly abused children of Portugal represent a fraction of a global industry. Its annual revenues were estimated in 2003 to exceed half a trillion dollars globally. This is twice the value of all United States currency currently in circulation at any given time, more than the annual gross national products of many countries.

To understand the sheer size of profits accruing from such terrible misery, consider this: a million dollars in gold would weigh as much as a Japanese Sumo wrestler. A half trillion dollars would come close to exceeding the entire population weight of a medium sized Australian city.

The profits come from child sexual trafficking in all its forms: white slavery, sex rings, pornography, the sex tourism industry, lap dancing, bogus adoption schemes and procuring the victims -- the untold millions of children globally entrapped in the sex trade industry who are forced to allow their bodies to be used in exchange for food, money, shelter, alcohol and drugs.

Children are bought, sold, traded and misused in underground child sex markets daily. Every state in the United States, and every other nation, contributes in some fashion to the steady flow of children, the customers and exploiters.

It is estimated that the profits from this vast evil empire, when properly invested, would draw an interest exceeding US $2 million an hour. The sexual trafficking in children is not so much an industry but a global empire.

Sovereign and expansionist, it is frequently torn by internal struggle -- fights to the death between the Chinese Triads and the Russian Mafia, between the multi-gangs of the Balkans, are commonplace. But the empire presents a secret front to the world. It is from there it plunders our children, snatches them, never to be seen again.

The predators who control the sexual trafficking in children are well organized. They have thugs who snatch and break the resistance of children; banks who account the empire's profits without asking questions; ships that convey the hapless children from one continent to another and private planes that transport them to clients around the world.

Yet there is little or no cohesive and sustained war against this terrible evil. The United States and Britain try to stamp on the trafficking within its own borders. But as yet there is no universal challenge to the ever-growing sexual trafficking in children.

The shabby streets of Cheb are but one staging post in a necklace of shame that encircles the globe.

To the east of Cheb, a battered Volvo crossed into northern Bosnia. Hidden under filthy blankets were four teenage girls. One, a blonde called Maria, had just celebrated her thirteenth birthday.

To prepare for the long and uncomfortable journey, the girls had each been given an injection by a doctor. They were told it was to alleviate travel sickness. In reality it was a cocktail of drugs to keep them drowsy and unable to try and escape. This is standard procedure for the men operating this segment of the network in sexual trafficking that criss-crosses the Balkans.

The doctor is a man known by his first name only, Goran, in the girl's hometown of Chisinau, the capital of Europe's poorest country, Moldova. It has some of the prettiest children in central Europe. This has made it a magnet for the traffickers.

They moved in soon after the collapse of the Communist system in the country. Since then there is a widely accepted estimate that some 6,000 girls have been trafficked out of Moldova. No one knows how many of them received their drug injections from Dr Goran.

The girls in the Volvo had answered advertisements in a Chisinau newspaper. The ads promised them work in Paris, London and Dublin -- and even in the United States. The posts on offer included maids, nannies, house-keeping and bar work. The ads stressed no previous experience was required. The salaries were far beyond those available in Moldova.

A Moldavian recruiter told the girls their journey would involve them first being secretly driven over the border into Bosnia. There, they would receive passports, for which they had already paid him US $100 -- money borrowed from their families and friends. Then they would go West to earn undreamed of money. So they had been promised.

The break-up of the former Yugoslavia, followed by a vicious war in the region and the establishment of new states under the 1995 Dayton peace accord, had left many Balkan countries with virtually no legislation or border controls to deal with the sexual traffic in young women and children.

By the time Maria and her three young friends had been tricked into making the journey in the Volvo, the profits from sexual trafficking in the Balkans were matching those of the drug trade -- and the penalties for smuggling humans were minimal.

The border guards into Bosnia waved the Volvo through. The car was a familiar sight to them. Each time it crossed, the guards received US $200 for allowing its unhampered passage.

Five hours later the Volvo reached its final destination. "Arizona Market" is on the outskirts of Kosovo. The town resembles the old Wild West rather than Central Europe in the Third Millennium. It is also the UN headquarters in Bosnia.

An area interlaced with muddy tracks lead to establishments with names like Café Marlboro, Café Don, and The Golden Heart. Fronted by heaps of refuse, used condoms and empty liquor bottles, they are brothels. Between them stand wooden huts selling cheap denim clothes, alcohol, perfume, and guns.

Inside the sleazy bars, the scene seldom changes: dimmed red lights, loud music, cheap drinks -- and semi-naked girls. Usually they are draped over the men known as "the internationalists". These are the soldiers of the United Nations multi-national peace keeping force. In 2003, it consisted of 45,000 soldiers drawn from 39 countries. In addition, there were some 7,000 UN staff as well as members of over 200 Western aid agencies.

Many of the girls appear to be drugged -- and not only from the ready supply of cocaine and heroin on open sale.

An American aid agency worker said: "Lookit, the bar owners who bought these girls like to keep them nice and quiet. So they buy drugs from some of the UN medics to do so. When a girl has finished her shift, she is taken to her room by a bar man and given a shot. When she wakes up she is ready for her next shift".

This is Arizona Market. Officially established by the peacekeeping forces to foster trade between Serbs, Croats and Muslims, today its five square miles is the epicenter of Bosnia's booming sex-slaves trade.

This was the destination of the four young girls. They would work here as prostitutes -- and maybe die -- in this forsaken place.

Almost 2,000 miles to the south of Bosnia, in the tropical heat of West Africa, a group of girls, each no more than thirteen years old, made their way to a small square in the suburbs of Abidjan, the capital of the Ivory Coast. They were escorted by hard-faced young men, the gold in their teeth glinting in the searing sunlight.

Dressed in their Sunday best -- colourful print cotton dresses -- with hair washed and combed, the girls were directed to sit on wooden benches in the centre of the square.

Each girl was for sale as a slave. Their prices ranged from US $5 -- the cost of a coffee in what passes for the city's finest hotel -- to the most expensive child, an eleven year old, costing US $15.

The place is known, locally, as Le Marche de Jeunes Filles -- the Market of Young Girls.

Buyers, men carrying fly-whisks, and sharp-eyed women, strolled up and down along the benches, feeling one girl's arm, looking at another's teeth. One was asked to stand and twirl. Another to bend.

Around the edges of the square stood the traders. The moment a prospective buyer stopped, a trader was there to emphasise a girl's good points.

"She is young and disease free. She is strong and will obey your every command. She will do whatever you want..." he would intone.

No one knows today how many sexual slaves there are in the world. The International Organisation for Migration estimated in December, 2003, that from Eastern Europe alone there could be half a million.

Anti-Slavery International believes the global figure may run to "tens of millions". The one certainty, adds the world's oldest human rights organisation, is that there are more sexual slaves than ever before.

The United States State Department announced in June, 2003, that fifteen countries were now deeply involved in trafficking humans. They included Greece and Italy, both members of the European Community. The State Department estimated that through the fifteen countries almost one million adults and children brought and sold annually into the sex slave market. Secretary of State Colin Powell rightly called it a blight on humanity.

There is growing evidence that many of those slaves are traded over the internet; pimps, often catering for extreme sexual demands ranging from unprotected sex to torture, can log on to women and children best suited to their "markets".

In Britain, Scotland Yard believes that over 5,000 girls from former-Communist countries were smuggled into the country in 2003. Each earned their pimps an estimated over US $2,000 a day.

Bill Hughes, Director General of Britain's National Crime Squad, said: "A growing number of girls are barely into their teens. Although the number is small compared to such countries as Greece and Italy, it has had a startling impact on London's indigenous vice trade.

"British teenagers have been moved out by their pimps into the city suburbs as their rates are undercut by sex slaves imported from the Balkans into London's traditional Soho red light district.

"They have come from Romania, the Ukraine and Moldova. The great majority have escaped from dirt-poor villages, with no modern form of communications -- some villages do not even have a single telephone let alone a policeman.

"That makes it easier for a young girl to be lured away or kidnapped from their homes -- and never to be traced again", added Hughes.

The former Soviet Republics are the nexus of the traffic. Serbia and Yugoslavia are key staging posts along this road of unspeakable misery. It is in those countries that the majority of girls are housed, waiting for pimps to conduct an initial inspection. The girls -- and some boys -- are then taken by road to one of the regular "flesh markets".

In 2003, those sales took place in the many apartment block complexes on the outskirts of Belgrade. The girls are handled like livestock and, once one has been bought by a pimp -- prices can be up to US $1,500 for a teenager, double that for a pre-teen -- the victim will usually be beaten, drugged and forced to have sex with scores of men a week. If she tries to escape, she can be subjected to further horrendous sexual abuse -- and warned that if she tries again to escape, her family back home will be killed.

The Belgrade apartments are owned by Semion Yokovich Mogilevich. He is a specialist in every type of major crime. A document by MI5, Britain's internal security service, describes this Ukranian as "one of the most dangerous criminals on earth".

Mogilevich is wanted in the United States for a multitude of crimes including bank frauds, money laundering and other currency offences. He is protected by his own private army -- and, according to CIA sources, he has a liking for young girls. Documents in the agency possession show he is a regular visitor to the apartments to pick out a girl.

One CIA document identifies Mogilevich as the head of the Rising Sun, one of Moscow's major criminal families.

"His business is global prostitution, drug running and traffic in humans. He runs a dark and evil empire. A number of people who have crossed his path have been disposed of. He has his own team of killers never further away than a phone call", said former British intelligence officer Colin Wallace.

Unable to travel to the West for fear of immediate arrest, Mogilevich moves between Moscow and Belgrade with his bodyguards and his latest choice of girl.

The office for the UN High Commission for Human Rights has identified other criminal gangs from Macedonia and Serbia as being involved in sex trafficking. But along with Mogilevich, it is the criminal warlords of Albania who now dominate it.

A report prepared by the Commission states:

"Girls who've shown signs of disobedience have had their feet cemented into washbasins before being dumped in the Aegean Sea. Others have been horrifically tortured. The Albanian gangs have a seemingly endless supply of women, and their power extends way beyond their homeland to the underworlds of Italy and parts of New York. The victims do not officially exist and are powerless to resist."

Most Albanian gangsters are men in their twenties from the backward north of the country. Rather than being based around individual gangland bosses, they are organized in clans bound by an ancient code of honour called kanun. Some of the profits are returned to their homelands.

In 2002, UN administration in Kosovo and Bosnia enacted new laws to prohibit the traffic. But there have been few prosecutions, and such as have occurred have been tainted by charges of corruption. UN teams set up to rescue the girls have often found that when they organise a raid, the brothel-keepers have been tipped off.

A UN report into trafficking claims that some Western officials are undermining attempts to clean up the trade by becoming cronies of Balkan pimps. The same is true of some of the international and local police. In one case, cited by the report, Bulgarian border police took money from girls to secure their safe passage back to Bulgaria, only to hand them back to the traffickers in exchange for yet more money.

The fate of those four young girls who were smuggled over the border into Bosnia to work in Arizona Market was to be hustled from the Volvo into a large wooden building. Standing around its walls were the brothel keepers of Arizona Market. Maria and her companions were ordered to undress. When Maria refused, her dress was ripped from her. Naked, she and the other girls were forced to stand on wooden crates. The brothel keepers physically inspected the women.

Then the bidding began. In minutes Maria had been sold to a brothel keeper for US $1,500. The other girls fetched prices ranging from US $350 to US $1,200.

For US $20 a client could spend thirty minutes with Maria. For US $2.50 he could buy a bottle of beer while he satisfied himself.

Maria would soon discover that there was no escape from a life where she is expected to have unprotected sex. She is owned body and soul by the man who bought her. All she receives are three meals a day, a bed to sleep on and the skimpy clothes her owner insists she must wear to attract clients.

A UN peacekeeper in Kosovo, who asked not to be named, told me: "Often the girls are sold on by other brothel keepers. They are traded like cattle and are routinely beaten and drugged. If a girl tries to escape, she is raped or tortured -- or told that her mother back home will be killed."

Milan Sitilovic, the Bosnian police chief with responsibility for Arizona Market says: "How can we stop it? Prostitution is the oldest profession in the world".

Frederick Larson who headed the office of the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) in Sarajevo identified the problem, "the girls are terrified of testifying against their owners. Those who dare to do so are simply murdered".

In 2001, the naked bodies of several girls were found in a river near Arizona Market. They bore the hallmarks of Russian mafia-style killings; hands had been tied behind their backs and their feet set in concrete. Their breasts had been slashed off.

Arizona Market is situated close to the Bosnian headquarters of the US peacekeeping force. During 2002, six Russian soldiers, members of K-For, gang-raped two girls in the Arizona Market. As they were "owned" by the club owner, the soldiers paid him a small sum in compensation. No other charges were brought against the rapists.

Those who survive such inhumane treatment are often sold on to the international slave market.

Paul Holmes, of London's Metropolitan Police Vice Squad, has estimated that 80% of all women working in the brothels of Britain's capital are from the Balkans. His own investigations concluded that the traffic in women had made their owners at least US $75 million since the start of the Third Millennium.

His facts and figures can be repeated through the Western world. In Paris, Dublin, Rome, New York, Montreal and Los Angeles, police report the same story: when rescued from sexual bondage, the women are too terrified to testify against those who traffic in them.

As of now the penalties against trading in preteen sex slaves is small compared to those handed out against drug runners or arms dealers. Indeed, in Bosnia, the offence is not even on the statute book.

Pino Arlacchi, executive director of the United Nations Office of Drug Control and Crime Prevention said: "the trafficking in people is now the fastest growing transnational criminal activity".

Frederick Larson explained that, apart from his organisation, there is almost nothing to protect sex slaves in Bosnia.

The girls are regarded as illegal immigrants, and are treated as such, rather than the victims of gross human rights violations. All NATO and UN officials who frequent Arizona Market are entitled to immunity from Bosnian prosecution -- although not from legal consequences when they return home.

However, the possibility of any conviction in a US or UK court is non-existent, given that no abused girl is ever likely to be able to give evidence.

Recently an international police team carried out a raid on three bars in Arizona Market. They rescued thirty-four girls, three of whom were aged just fourteen. The raids were carried out without the assistance of the local police.

Afterwards, team members faced disciplinary charges for "exceeding their authority". The charges were not pursued; the officers have quietly left Bosnia.

The IOM has set up safe houses in Sarajevo to protect girls, some as young as eleven, who have escaped from brothels.

"The best we can do is to offer them support and repatriation", said Larson.

But the reality again is that a girl who does go home to a country like Moldova is often cast-out by her family who suspect what happened to her in Bosnia. All too often, she ends up prostituting herself on the streets of the country's capital, Chisnau.

In Bosnia, the international peace-keeping force has failed to control, let alone eradicate, the transport of sexual slaves.

Jaque Grinberg, the UN missions head of civil affairs -- a caring and committed official -- said there was "an urgent need for an effective border force". The office of the High Representative in Bosnia ordered its creation. But there was no money to bring it to reality.

The trafficking business started with the arrival of UN peacekeepers in 1993. Until then Bosnia had no "sex industry". The mission of the peacekeepers was to bring democracy. But too many of their members saw an easy way to make money as well as satisfy their own sexual desires.

"After the peacekeepers arrived, criminal gangs who had smuggled guns during the war began to traffic in women and girls. There was more profit and less risk. And so it goes on", said a member of the international police force, Don Thomas.

"The evils of what is going on are obvious. But the problem is that the victims are horribly exploited, many of them also claim they are not in Bosnia involuntarily. That is the rub. How can you convince some kid who is so terrified that she will not talk? If she opens her mouth she is dead meat", added Thomas.

The worst offenders are the 3,000 Russian peace-keepers. Some girls have described how friends were taken into the Russian camps and never seen again.


Unlike Bosnia, where the UN peacekeepers arrived in a blaze of publicity, no one knows exactly when "the Germans" started to arrive in their big cars for sex with the children of Cheb.

The men who drive into the cheerless town know they no longer have to fly to Thailand to have sex with a child.

Many of the child prostitutes come from Cheb's large Roman refugee population. Their knowledge of German is confined to the sexual words of their trade.

By night, they haunt the park adjoining the town's Evropska Street or stand in darkened doorways in the alleys.

New byelaws have forbidden street prostitution in the centre of Cheb; video cameras have been installed to monitor the area.

Catherin Schauer, a nurse who works for Karo, a child-rescue project supported by the German Red Cross and the European Commission, said the police are largely indifferent to what goes on.

"Those who work as prostitutes are usually homeless and turned on to drugs. They start by sniffing glue and then move on to a substance known as ‘piko", a cheap amphetamine which suppresses feelings of cold and hunger", said Schauer.

Some of the children have been born in Cheb after their families fled from eastern Europe in the aftermath of the collapse of the Soviet Union. At an age when their childhood is beginning to expand, they are forced into prostitution.

One girl, her face smeared with make-up who admitted she was thirteen, said "the Germans like us to wear as little as possible. I only wear a short skirt and a t-shirt and my sandals".

She added that in "a good night" she had four or five clients. "They pay me anything from US $20 to US $30 dollars. It's good money for a few hours of work. I always make them use a condom. But some of the younger girls allow unprotected sex. Because they are not menstruating, they believe they won't become pregnant".

Catherine Schauer said that a growing number of these under-age girls had developed HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.

She and her colleagues distribute condoms to the children. The rescue centre has a drop-in facility where the children can go for treatment.

"We are a little sensitive about all this. There would not be a problem but for the Germans. We know that the sex tourists are 99 percent from Bavaria and Saxony", said Petr Jaks, Cheb's deputy mayor.

He did admit there had been "a problem to get our police motivated, but we hope this will change soon".

A senior police officer reluctantly agreed to talk on the basis of having his identity concealed.

"My colleagues and I have better things to do than check on every kid who hangs around the streets. As far as we are concerned, they are just out for a night of fun. Look at the way they dress: good quality jeans, Adidas shoes. Sure, they may take a little dope. But so do the kids in Munich."

What about all the Germans who drive into the town every night? The officer shrugged. "They spend good money in our bars. If they pick up a girl, so what. It happens everywhere."

Even small children? He smiled indifferently. "How can you tell if a girl is ten, thirteen or fifteen? These Romanian kids grow up quickly. Anyway, why pick on Cheb? Prostitution is all along the border."

That is true. At every crossing, the child whores are there, alongside the traders selling cheap cigarettes and Becherovka, the Czech national drink.

Catherin Schauer and her small team of dedicated social workers note down the license plate numbers of the German cars entering the town, then send them to the nearest German city of Regensburg.

There is a German law, passed in 1993, under which the Federal Republic can prosecute men who have sex with minors abroad. If found guilty, a culprit can be sentenced up to ten years in jail.

But, as in Bosnia, the reality is very different. Josef Heisl, a police officer with the Regensburg force said "when we get the license plates from Cheb, we do question the car drivers. The men just say they were looking for directions. To make a successful prosecution, we have to catch a man in the act of having sex with a minor -- or get a child to file a complaint. That is purely wishful thinking".

Just as in Cheb, the turnover of girls is high at Le Marche de Jeunes Filles -- the baked earth market place in Abidjan, the capital of the Ivory Coast.

The girls come from the country's remote rural areas, lured away from their villages by promise of a better life in the city. Family and friends sew their new clothes and arrange their hair before they leave home. But once they arrive in Abidjan, they find there is no work; instead they are sold-off like cattle in that market place.

Some, the lucky ones, are sent to toil in up-country cocoa plantations. Others are shipped off to Sudan, where slave traders shackle them for the long journey to the Middle East to restock the region's brothels.

Still others end up in a truck stop called Salgaa on the main Kenya-Uganda highway. It is the biggest whorehouse in central Africa. In 2003, it had 24 bars and 500 prostitutes -- an estimated half of them under age.

In a regional economy that is close to collapse elsewhere, Salgaa is booming. It is a cut-price version of Arizona Market. In Salgaa a child can be procured for one US dollar. In Salgaa the life expectancy of a prostitute is put in months rather than years. Their clients are the thousands of truck drivers who travel every week up and down the highway.

The girls work out of seedy bars with names like the Good Times Hotel and New Paradise.

AIDS is a killer by many names here: "mikingo" meaning "slow puncture"; and "kauzi" meaning "slim as a thread", an apt description to describe the body wasting process of the disease.

Sharin Cmemtai, who admitted to being "only fifteen", said that her "worst clients are the Arabs. They can be very violent. I try to charge them more. But it is impossible for me to keep the extra money. He always takes it straight away after sex".

"He" was her pimp, a burly Kenyan who is reputed to have a stable of fifty young girls, a number of them in their pre-teens, working in Salgaa.

His girls live in a small compound. It has one water tap, two showers and three stinking pit latrines. Most weeks a girl is diagnosed as in the final stages of AIDS. Overnight she will be taken from the compound by the pimp. There is a widespread fear she is dumped in the bush to be devoured by the jackals or other wild animals.

Within hours a new girl will arrive as a replacement.

She, too, can expect to be dead within a year. To survive longer in Salgaa is a miracle.

Only none of the girls who work there believe in such divine intervention.

The global traffic in children for commercial sexual exploitation involves torture and their premeditated rape and mutilation. If and when the authorities decide to take action against the child sex trade, it achieves very little.

This terrible human abuse, the prerogative of no one race or colour, continues to occur under all religions, and where there is no religion. The sexual traffic in children is the product of greed and lust which feeds off abject poverty.

There is no solution in sight until that poverty is addressed -- and the traffickers sentenced to long terms. By a collective indifference and silence, the betrayal of children will persist.

© Gordon Thomas 2006

Saturday, March 28, 2009

So Much Australia cared about Human Rights - Aborigines letter to the UN

World's governments being asked to help the Aborigines

Goodooga, northwest-NSW, 24 March 09 - - As Australia is having to answer to the United Nations Human Rights Committee over its treatment of Aborigines, a northwest-NSW Aboriginal leader is asking the governments of all member countries of the UN to help overturn the Northern Territory intervention and recognise Aboriginal sovereignty.

This follows an urgent decision by the UN's Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination on 13 March condemning Australia's suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act as part of the intervention.

Michael Anderson, Leader of the Euahlayi Nation and elected spokesman of the 16 clans in the Gumilaroi nation, has lobbied at past CERD conferences and has written the letter below to member countries' missions in New York.

"Australia must be held accountable by the international community for its Human Rights breaches and abuses against Aboriginal Peoples in Australia and its strident opposition to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples," Anderson says in the letter.

Anderson and other Aboriginal leaders from all over Australia have also asked President Barack Obama to intervene (http://sydney.indymedia.org.au/story/media-release-aboriginal-people-brief-barack-obama-his-meeting-kevin-rudd) when he meets with Prime Minister Kevin Rudd in Washington on Wednesday our time (early Tuesday US).

Here is the letter to the UN missions:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

23 March 2009

Your Excellency,

Australia's continued human rights violations and abuses of Aboriginal peoples

We enter into this correspondence with you to highlight the fact that Australia has not earned the right to have permanency status on the UN Security Council.

Australia is the only country in the world that has a constitution that allows for the imposition of laws and/or regulations that target specific racial groups. Section 51 (xxvi) says:
Australian Constitution - Section 51 - Legislative powers of the Parliament

The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:-

(xxvi.) The people of any race, for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws:
In the Hindmarsh Island Court case, Justice Kirby pointed out that this section does not necessarily require any Australian government, whether they be Labor, Liberal or National Party, to always pass beneficial laws, rather it permits the passing of laws that can be detrimental or against any race as they deem necessary. [Kartinyeri-v-The Commonwealth 1998 HCA (High Court of Australia) 22 at para 163]

If we are to question why this section exists at all in the Australian constitution, we only have to visit some key documents that describe the thinking that existed in Australia pre-federation of 1901 and immediately thereafter.

In 1901 the first federal prime minister, Edmund Barton, advocated for a continent that could be free of ‘contamination' by foreign and unwanted racial impurities by quoting Professor Pearson:

'The fear of Chinese immigration which the Australian democracy cherishes ... is in fact, the instinct of self-preservation, quickened by experience ... We are guarding the last part of the world in which the higher races can live and increase freely for the higher civilisation ... The day will come ... when the European observers will look around the globe girdled with a continuous zone of the yellow and black races. It is idle to say that if all this should come to pass our pride and place will not be humiliated. We are struggling among ourselves for supremacy in a world which we thought of as destined to belong to the Aryan race; and to the Christian faith; to the letters and arts and charms which we have inherited from the best of times.'

Unfortunately the majority of European and non-Aboriginal thinking in Australia today continues to reflect racist ideologies, which in turn permits the continued emergence of prejudice and discrimination against Aboriginal Peoples by the dominant society.

Australia is a country of contradictions. On the one hand, it promotes living in harmony and reconciliation, without any real effort to enter into meaningful dialogue with the Aboriginal communities throughout Australia. This reflects Australia's unwillingness to recognise Aboriginal Peoples for who we really are.

Aboriginal people continue to argue that we have never been defeated in battle, neither have we ceded nor relinquished our sovereignty.

Australia continues to operate in the world under a flawed legal assumption that Australia is bona fide by virtue of an antiquated international doctrine as is referred to in the Mabo judgment No. 2 when Brennan J relied upon:

'The acquisition of territory by a sovereign state for the
first time is an act of state which cannot be challenged,
controlled or interfered with by the courts of that state.'

[Mabo v Queensland (No 2) ("Mabo case") [1992] HCA 23; (1992)
175 CLR 1 (3 June 1992) at para 31]

It cannot be a fact that a civilised society, which has been invaded in this manner, does not have any legal rights to question the powers of the invading authorities. In respect to the claim of Act of State, former chief Justice Mason of the High Court commented after the Mabo decision that Blackstone's Commentaries on international law at the time clearly suggest that the Aboriginal Nation States could be recognised and therefore treaties and other arrangements could be entered into, if the invading State had chosen to. There is sufficient correspondence between the invaders in Australia and British colonialists in England that suggested and recommended that treaties with the Aborigines be entered into but the colonial authorities in the invaded territories refused.

We assert that the court got it right when it states that the issue of Aboriginal Sovereignty cannot be dealt with by the High Court and it belongs to another jurisdiction. Brennan J concludes in the High Court Mabo No.2 Judgment:

‘1. The Crown's acquisition of sovereignty over the several parts of Australia cannot be challenged in an Australian municipal court.‘ [at para 83]

All laws passed in relation to Native Title rights and interests are legally presumptuous and therefore the judgements are dubious, because the issue of the Sovereignty of Aboriginal Peoples is still subject to international legal definition. While the Mabo judgement No. 2 erased the myth of terra nullius, we cannot permit Australia to continue with another myth, which is that associated with the High Court's right to rule on Aboriginal proprietary interests in land (Native Title rights) without first having resolved the issue of Aboriginal Sovereignty in Australia by the international legal jurisdiction.

I also wish to draw attention to the Northern Territory Emergency Response. Advice given to me suggests that this NT Intervention is a response to an alleged state of emergency associated with child abuse and domestic violence and that the executive government in 2007 irrationally decreed this Northern Territory Emergency Response, which has its origin in martial law.

Since colonisation there have been a number of proclamations of a similar nature, which gave the police and the military absolute power and authority over Aboriginal Peoples in a defined area, e.g. Governor Macquarie's Proclamation of 1815.

Under the existing Northern Territory ‘state of emergency' all powers have been vested in the military, which has engaged the Federal Police to police the communities, thus presenting an image of civil control outside of the military. This practice is merely a façade to shield the military powers. In order for the NT Intervention to remain ‘legal' it requires the continuation of the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act (RDA) 1975 in Australia.

On 13 March 2009 the Urgent Action CERD decision from Fatimata-Binta Victoire Dah, Chairperson of the Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, condemned Australia's suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975:

'... in order to continue a constructive dialogue with your Government, the Committee requests the State party to submit further details and information on the following issues no later than 31 July 2009:

  • Progress on the drafting of the redesigned measures, in direct consultation with the communities and individuals affected by the NTER [Northern Territory Emergency Response], bearing in mind their proposed introduction to the Parliament in September 2009.
  • Progress on the lifting of the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act.'

Aboriginal people question how can compulsorily acquiring peoples' land protect children and why does the Australian government need until September before they reverse the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act. It is within their power (if the political will is there) to repeal the Northern Territory Emergency Response Acts and reinstate the Racial Discrimination Act in the next winter sitting of Federal Parliament. The question is why do they wait till our next spring sitting before they do it.

Today, 23 March 2009, the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Jenny Macklin, has advised the Tangentyere Council in Alice Springs that she has extended the deadline for the Tangentyere Council to sign over their leases of the Town Camps, under their jurisdiction, by 2 May 2009, otherwise no housing projects will be funded nor will any community infrastructure be put in place for Aboriginal communities in these Town Camps. This is an act by an intolerant minister, who is dictating and blackmailing defenceless and disadvantaged peoples.

Detail of the racism imposed by the Northern Territory Intervention recently sent to President Obama is available from this link:

http://sydney.indymedia.org.au/story/letter-president-obama-barbara-shaw-rudd-government-s-treatment-aboriginal-nations-and-peoples

In conclusion, it is our hope that from this piece of correspondence your government will raise the seriousness of the issues that we have discussed with the Australian Labor government and urge them, in the strongest terms, to take immediate steps to reinstate the Racial Discrimination Act that affects the civil liberties, rights and freedoms of Aboriginal Peoples in Australia, under the Early Warning and Urgent Action procedures of the CERD.

Moreover, we ask that you include in your correspondence, should your government decide to do so, to urge in the strongest terms to repeal the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 in the Native Title Amendment Act 1998, as was recommended by CERD and ECOSOC, and to permit the courts of Australia to consider Aboriginal proprietary interests and rights in land as a common law right, as was the case in the original Mabo No. 2 judgement, as opposed to having the courts decide rights and interests based upon a coded legislative regime set by the Australian Parliament.

Australia must be held accountable by the international community for its Human Rights breaches and abuses against Aboriginal Peoples in Australia and its strident opposition to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

This is why we have criticised Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd's ambition to seek permanency status on the UN Security Council. Australia has not earned this right and responsibility.

Yours faithfully

Michael Anderson

Leader of Euahlayi Nation

+61 (0) 427 292 492 and +61 2 6829 6355

ngurampaa@bigpond.com

So Much the UN cared about Human Rights - Tamil Links in UN, Terrorism, bogus refugees and terrorist funding from UK

Open Letter to Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon UN

Ben Silva UK



18 – 03 - 09

Dear Sir,
Tamil Links in UN, terrorism, bogus refugees and terrorist funding from UK

I have discussed below, various inter linked issues related to terrorism, Sri Lanka and the UN so that you are aware of the concerns of many Sri Lankans.
When LTTE carried out terrorism in Sri Lanka, UN was absolutely silent and gave no help to deal with terrorism. UN was silent when terrorists carried out child soldier recruitment and when Tamil LTTE carried out terrorist activities against defenceless civilians. UN was silent when LTTE agents killed defenceless Sinhala villagers by hacking them to death. UN is incapable of understanding the true situation in Sri Lanka and UN is unable to distinguish between the victim and the culprit. UN did nothing to dismantle the shipping, procurement, financial, propaganda and other LTTE structures that are overseas, from India to Canada and Australia. In short, UN did nothing to curtail the activities of the terrorist group LTTE. Terrorism could have been eliminated by cutting off their life line, but UN did nothing of the sort, and is now trying to give a life line to the terrorists. In the view of many, such attempts will only lead to more unnecessary loss of human lives. What is even more worrying is evidence that LTTE has managed to infiltrate UN. Leaked reports containing incorrect data based on LTTE media outlets, quoted in the Inner City Press, , is an indication that LTTE sympathisers are busy discrediting Sri Lanka. The biased nature of UN in favour of LTTE is a serious matter and need the attention of senior UN officials.

In a nutshell, the problem appears to be that a group of global, networked Tamils are funding the Sri Lankan terror group LTTE, to create a mono ethnic racial state, perhaps with the intention of expanding Tamil Nadu state, in South India.

If UN is genuinely interested in Human rights, it would have taken action to stop funding being received by LTTE.
Sri Lanka is a victim of terrorism and the people who should be responsible for the death and destruction in Sri Lanka are those that funded the terrorists, those that gave residency to bogus refugees and those that turned a blind eye to terrorism such as UK authorities and the UN.

Tamils have projected the image that they are the underdogs, in order to get sympathy and to obtain bogus refugee status. In reality Tamils are a powerful group with international connections, even connection in the UN. They are attempting to carve out a part of Sri Lanka. The real underdogs and the victims are the poor, voiceless, Sinhalese peasants.

It is indeed UK that allowed an estimated 300000 bogus refugees [9],[11] into UK and then turned a blind eye to propaganda and fund raising by LTTE agents. The global bogus Tamil refugees number around 1 million and they appear to exert considerable unfair political muscle. It is utter hypocrisy for UK to show concern about human rights, when it is UK that allowed LTTE to base its head Office in London and then allowed LTTE to grow into a monster.

It is well known that LTTE fire at fleeing civilians and have killed escaping civilians, as a human shield is the only way to protect the terrorists from the security forces. In addition LTTE have sent suicide bombers to IDP camps, to discourage civilians to escape to safe areas. Rather sadly, any liberation of civilians may cause collateral damage. It is hoped that the damage is kept to a minimum. Even neutralising 10 terrorists in Mumbai resulted in the loss of over 200 civilians.

The situation in Sri Lanka is a complex issue and asking for a ceasefire, without understanding the situation is meaningless.

Both UN and UK have been touting for a ceasefire. I will ask the question, which has been asked by Shenali Waduge before, ‘how can a ceasefire release civilian hostages especially those being forcefully kept by the LTTE and condensed to 31sq.km?’
It is most likely that LTTE will use the ceasefire to rearm, regroup and increase the grip on civilians, as they have done on all occasions previously, costing more lives, when LTTE is dislodged. It is certain to cost more lives if they are allowed to survive. It is important that OHCHR, the UN, the Peace Activists, the NGOs/INGOs and all those who steer the bandwagon for ceasefires actually make an attempt to understand the situation in Sri Lanka. This may be difficult task due to the lack of professionalism of the above mentioned groups.

These groups such as HRW do not even understand that authenticity, accuracy, bias are important issues to be considered when using secondary data. These groups including UN and HRW appear to use innuendo, hearsay, propaganda material from LTTE media outlets such as Tamilnet as Gospel truth. The above mentioned groups simply parrot LTTE propaganda. Further Tamils in UN such as Ms Navanethem Pillay appear to play Tamil Tiger tribal politics, which will discredit UN. Ms Pillay has not recognised that ‘human rights violations in this respect has been brought about by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, the LTTE, when it mercilessly herded up the civilian population of Wanni, uprooted them from their traditional habitats and marched them on foot day and night as human shields. This was done at gunpoint’. Ref: United Nations is not the place for Navi Pillay to serve, by Durga Velautham in New Delhi, http://www.amarasara.info/hotnews/20090318-01.htm#United

Many would ask, did she ignore LTTE atrocities because she is a racist LTTE supporter or is it because she is incompetent as her predecessor, clueless Ms Arbour was. Or is it that UN is unable to stand up to powerful and rich terrorist groups and simply put the blame on the victim ?

As for the civilians trapped by LTTE, they are the brothers and sisters of all Sri Lankans and it is our duty to protect them.

As such, the biased opinions of Tamils, playing tribal politics need to be challenged and appropriate persons informed. For both UN and UK, they can talk peace, but for Sri Lankans, who have lost over 60000. due to the terrorist menace and who have suffered enormously, action is needed to permanently eradicate terrorism.

It is complete fallacy to talk about Tamil Home land in Sri Lanka, when the whole of Sri Lanka was the home of the Sinhalese . The Tamil home land is in South India. Unfortunately, from time to time, invaders from South India, temporarily occupied parts of Sri Lanka and they were always driven back. Modern Sri Lanka, in a global village, should be for all Sri Lankans, and racists should not be allowed to grab a part of Sri Lanka, for a mono ethnic, racist Tamil state.

UK heavily favoured Tamils and heavily discriminated against the Sinhalese.

Sri Lankans had to suffer the pain of terrorism for over 25 years and it is utter shame that countries such as UK and organisations such as UN are now trying to give a life line to the deadliest terror group in the world. If UN or UK are genuinely interested in human rights, then they should:
1. Ask LTTE to free the civilians
2. Ask LTTE to surrender
3. Provide technical assistance to Sri Lanka So that civilian casualties could be kept to a minimum
4. Provide technical assistance to Sri Lanka so that it is possible to distinguish the civilians from the terrorists
5. Provide technical assistance to disable terrorists
6. Stop funds flowing into LTTE offers
7. Stop propaganda and political activities of various LTTE fronts.
8. Instruct LTTE not to engage in military activities in the NFZ, not to take cover using civilians, not to fire at security forces from the NFZ.
9. Stop arms procurement by LTTE fronts.

At the moment Sri Lanka is trying to stop the insane terrorists and Sri Lanka should be allowed to finish the job. A generation of Sri Lankans of all ethnic groups have lost normal living due to terrorism. Sri Lanka should be allowed to finish off terrorism and get on with living. The countries that allowed terrorist fund raising should be invited to share the expenses for the care of disabled and orphans.

Remember forces lead by USA killed over 100000 Iraqi civilians as a result of the conflict in Iraq.
Sri Lanka has to explain the deadly nature of LTTE to the world, with appropriate evidence. It has to be clearly explained, with evidence, that no one in Sri Lanka would be safe if LTTE is allowed to exist as many suspect the mental state of Prabakaran.

As for Sri Lankan Tamils they are our brothers and sisters and we have a collective responsibility for each others safety and welfare.

Many suspect that LTTE has infiltrated UN.

The problem in Sri Lanka is mainly due to Tamil racism, that is trying to carve out a part of Sri Lanka to expand the Tamil Nadu state. LTTE is doing a ‘Hitler’. Many believe that the leader of LTTE is similar to Pol Pot and that LTTE is an extremely racist organisation. No one inb Sri Lanka would be safe if LTTE is allowed to survive. It is the responsibility of our missions abroad and also GoSL to explain to the world, the real threat faced by all Sri Lankans from LTTE and alsothe danger of giving a life line to LTTE.

Sri Lanka should have the right to safeguard its territory and the people from internationally funded, global racist terror organisations. Unless proper information is communicated to the world, the world may not understand the true situation faced by Sri Lanka. There is lot of scope for improvement in Communication skills of GoSL.

LTTE is holding civilians as hostages and as a human shield, and yet UN is inactive against LTTE. UN has failed to understand the nature of the conflict in Sri Lanka.

Unfortunately for Sri Lanka, Tamils such as Ms Coomaraswamy, who displays Tamil tribalism on her face is occupying a key position in UN.

Further the Human rights Chief of UN is yet another Tamil from South Africa. It is well known that South African Tamils are biased against Sri Lanka. Media reports have indicated that LTTE pilots may have been trained in South Africa.

I have to state that I consider Sri Lankan Tamils as part of the family and I have no issues with them. I am however concerned about the racist attitude of some Tamils with a Chola mentality.

The comments made by Ms Pillay show that she is biased against Sri Lanka and she should not deal with issues related to Sri Lanka.
These facts need to be drawn to the attention of world leaders immediately.

Why has the UN not taken any action against coalition forces, that killed over 100000 civilians in Iraq.? UN itself should be taken to task for taking no action against terrorists and terrorism. Is it because some key UN officials are Tamils and LTTE has infiltrated UN ?

Yours sincerely,
Ben Silva

References
1. Tiger Tax Part 1 http://www.mefeedia.com/entry/3398206/
2. Tiger Tax part 2 http://beta.muxlim.tv/video/JwY5whNFLjA
3. UK Double Standard Helps Terror Alastair Reynard Alastair Reynar http://www.lankaweb.com/news/items08/160608-3.html
4. Visa scam trio 'must pay £2.3m'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/6994087.stm
5. HAS LABOUR TOTALLY FAILED TO CONTROL IMMIGRATION? http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/31652/Has-Labour-totally-failed-to-control-immigration%3F/
6. Labour's left it too late to get a grip on immigration http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23575059-details/Labour's+left+it+too+late+to+get+a+grip+on+immigration/article.do
7. Real story behind Tamil tigers http://www.lankanewspapers.com/news/2008/2/24775_space.html
8. Violence of Tamil gangs revealed
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3096978.stm
9. Five US Citizens to claim asylum in UK , London lite 16 Oct 2006, Anna Davis 10. Jane's Sentinel examines the success of the LTTE http://www.janes.com/security/international_security/news/sentinel/sent000904_6_n.shtml

11. . Steve Moxon, ref: The Great Immigration Scandal, Steve Moxon, 2006, imprint Academic

So Much EU cared about Human Rights - demanded Cuba to release political dissidents while passed a law to jail illiegal immigrants for up to 18 mths

Castro condemns EU's 'hypocrisy'

Former Cuban President Fidel Castro has lashed out at the EU's decision to lift sanctions against his country, calling it "an enormous hypocrisy".


He said the move was "disparaging" because it was conditioned on human rights progress in Cuba.


The ailing 81-year-old said the measure came just days after the EU passed a "brutal" law that could jail illegal immigrants up to 18 months.


The EU lifted the sanctions against Cuba in principle on Thursday.


The decision is expected to come into formal effect on Monday. The EU said its move was aimed at encouraging change in Cuba, following Fidel Castro's replacement by his brother Raul in February.


The decades-old US trade embargo against Cuba remains in place.



EU warning


In an article published on Cuba's official website, Fidel Castro said he wanted "to put in writing my contempt for the enormous hypocrisy that surrounds the [EU] decision".


There will be very clear language also on what the Cubans still have to do

Benita Ferrero-Waldner
EU External Relations Commissioner

While saying that Cuba must improve its human rights record and free political prisoners, the EU mistreats illegal immigrants from Latin America by using the new law to jail and expel them, Mr Castro wrote.

"From Cuba, in the name of human rights, they demand impunity for those [dissidents] that try to deliver... the homeland and the people to imperialism," he said, referring to the US.

The EU sanctions were imposed in 2003 in protest at the Cuban government's imprisonment of more than 70 dissidents.

They included a limit on high-level government visits and the participation of EU diplomats in cultural events in Cuba.

But EU External Relations Commissioner Benita Ferrero-Waldner said on Thursday the EU would continue to monitor human rights conditions in Cuba.

"There will be very clear language also on what the Cubans still have to do... releasing prisoners, really working on human rights questions," she told reporters at an EU summit in Brussels.

The sanctions' removal is largely symbolic but still a success for Raul Castro's new government, analysts say.

Several leading Cuban dissidents have criticised the decision.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/americas/7466943.stm

So Much the US cared about Human Rights - OBAMA BOWS TO PRESSURE: Drops U.S. from Major Anti-Racism Conference

OBAMA BOWS TO PRESSURE: Drops U.S. from Major Anti-Racism Conference

http://eurweb.com/story/eur51521.cfm

Even with a Black man as president, the U.S. government appeared ready last week to bow to Jewish pressure and boycott a major international conference designed to combat racism.

The conference, informally known as the Durban Review, is scheduled for April with the aim of evaluating progress toward the goals of the 2001 “World Summit against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance.”

The 2001 Summit was held in Durban, South Africa. But under heavy pressure from American Jewish organizations and the state of Israel, the U.S. State Department announced last week that it will probably boycott the April gathering because preliminary documents unfairly criticize Israel’s continuing occupation of Palestinian lands and its often brutal and racist treatment of the Palestinian people.

The U.S. is also opposed to language which calls for reparations for slavery and Arab recommendations which it says might restrict freedom of speech.

Thus far the only nations which appear ready to follow the U.S. boycott are Israel and Canada. Several U.S. human rights groups are denouncing the U.S. boycott plans but led by the Anti-Defamation League, most major American Jewish organizations are applauding it. (source: Taylor Media Services)